Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: americanophile

Only the women willing to hook for food will vote for him, since the rest will be worried about what they, their husbands, and boyfriends will do for work.

So, I guess its true that Gingrich may not get the liberal hooker vote.

However, the libs keep passing all kinds of nanny state laws all the time, so maybe not.

Gingrich is in most hookers demographic, so, again, maybe not.

If women are dumb enough to stick with a guy that openly supports Islam, despite it being one of the most anti-feminist factions on the planet, then maybe we ought to look at the 19th Amendment again.


41 posted on 01/20/2012 2:09:56 PM PST by RinaseaofDs (Does beheading qualify as 'breaking my back', in the Jeffersonian sense of the expression?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: RinaseaofDs
If women are dumb enough to stick with a guy that openly supports Islam, despite it being one of the most anti-feminist factions on the planet, then maybe we ought to look at the 19th Amendment again.

Maybe Churchill was right:

“If we allow women to vote it will mean the loss of social structure and the rise of every liberal cause under the sun. Women are well represented by their fathers, brothers and husbands.” 1910-Winston Churchill.

84 posted on 01/20/2012 2:57:15 PM PST by cayuga (The next Crusade will be a war of annihilation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson