Nothing I posted was about my righteousness, or lack thereof. You projected that. It was a logical argument on the consequences of floppy moral principles. In fact, the insights behind what I wrote were based in my own journey to lean how to tell an ever better truth. As far as I am concerned, G_d Himself and alone owns that capability.
An effective liar believes in what he is saying at the time. Clinton did it by subjective definition of terms, "is" being the most famous example. Obama does it by thinking his statements applicable only in terms of 'his people' as supposedly the dispossessed. Newtie does it by aligning himself with the university elite adhering to their (albeit Marxist) ideas about truth, anthropogenic global warming or biodiversity being prime examples of such a cause celebre outweighing conservative principles in his mind.
Liars attract liars, in Newt's case, this includes people who want so badly to win that they'll explain away anything (and yes, I'm referring to his youth). Enjoy your fantasy.
“Enjoy your fantasy.”
I would rather you continue to enjoy yours. Because that’s the motto of the Santorum run so far. A nowhere candidate that is still living off a screwed up caucus in Iowa as if he won 55 states already.
Now he is just looking to wallow around in Romneys/MSMs dung pile because he thinks he will come out with no smell.