Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Seizethecarp
Sounds like a "gay" argument, in that it is biologically impossible NOT to have a father.

Therefore, the religious aspect is not an issue (whether the "marriage" was legal), and the plain language "born of a Citizen mother and Citizen father") eliminates "single parenthood", formerly known as "slut", "trollop", "tramp", etc.

36 posted on 01/19/2012 8:16:28 AM PST by traditional1 (Free speech for me.....not for thee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: traditional1
“Therefore, the religious aspect is not an issue (whether the “marriage” was legal), and the plain language “born of a Citizen mother and Citizen father”) eliminates “single parenthood”, formerly known as “slut”, “trollop”, “tramp”, etc.”

Whether a child has a legal father is not exclusively a religious question under established international law going back to the time of the founders.

It is a fact IIRC that absent a marriage of the mother, the child gets only the citizenship of the mother.

The explicit language of the 1948 BNA which does NOT grant UK citizenship to bastards is NOT based on religious marriage but legal marriage.

BHO Sr’s legal tribal marriage to Kezia in Kenya (a NON-Muslim marriage, BTW...all the children of that marriage were NOT raised Muslim.. but one converted as an adult) was publicly affirmed by BHO Sr. in his letters to Tom Mboya in the Stanford archive and effectively considered to be legally valid marriage by the US INS in file notations when they booted BHO Sr.

42 posted on 01/19/2012 8:28:22 AM PST by Seizethecarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson