Help me out here. Suppose that Georgia can’t force anything out of Hawaii due to questions of state sovereignty. But, isn’t Georgia in control of its own nominating process?
Then, although it Georgia may not be able to compel document production from Hawaii, Georgia could also decide that the defendant Barry isn’t documenting his qualifications because those document were not produced. In other words, it could become in Barry’s interest to produce documentation supporting his claim as a legal candidate if he can.
Which he can’t IFF his father was born in Kenya.
Obama makes the choice not to support his case with birth documents makes him one step closer of not getting on the ballot in Georgia.
Here is Taitz response to the ‘Motion To Quash’ her subpoenas.
Here’s an excerpted response from Dr. Taitz, Esq.’s blog:
1. most of his motion is a total BS, irrelevant material, improper attacks on plaintiff’s counsel with an attempt to prejudice the court
2. Obama has no standing to challenge subpoenas issued and addressed to other parties. If other parties want to challenge, it is up to them. It is interesting that he mentions Susan Daniels, John Smpson and Loretta Fuddy, I wonder why? Is there something in their testimony he does not want to be heard by the judge?
3. there is nothing in subpoena issued to him, that is improper or oppressive
4. he was properly served through his attorney in Atlanta GA, within the jurisdiction
It is astonishing that we are even having this conversation. EVERY SINGLE STATE should demand to see a certified copy of his original birth certificate before even considering letting him on the ballot. This is simple. You no have, you no go on ballot.
I chalk it up to utter incompetence that 50 agencies charged with certifying candidates simply took Nancy Pelosi's word instead of doing due diligence.