Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: onyx

It’s happening FAST now ... Sarah’s endorsement ... tomorrow’s debate ... Saturday’s voting ...

Who’ll take the high road and make way for Newt? Who has enough humility? Who can rein in that nasty devil, EGO, long enough to skewer Romney?


51 posted on 01/18/2012 2:46:35 PM PST by b9 (NEWT all the way)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]


To: b9

Excellent questions! I’ll guess none. You?

Sarah took the lead. GO NEWT!

STAY FOCUED AND WIN THE DEBATE TOMORROW NIGHT!


56 posted on 01/18/2012 5:01:29 PM PST by onyx (PLEASE SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC - DONATE MONTHLY! If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, let me know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

To: b9

Excellent questions! I’ll guess none. You?

Sarah took the lead. GO NEWT!

STAY FOCUSED AND WIN THE DEBATE TOMORROW NIGHT!


57 posted on 01/18/2012 5:02:01 PM PST by onyx (PLEASE SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC - DONATE MONTHLY! If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, let me know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

To: b9; onyx

Actually Sarah didn’t endorse. Erickson has it wrong. imo, Sarah likes Newt, Rick and Rick, and will see which of those guys stick.

Hannity said that Palin wants the vetting to continue, so I did a search so I could post an excerpt with link about Sarah:

“Sarah Palin: If I lived in S.C. I’d vote for Newt
The Right Scoop on Jan 17, 2012

Sarah Palin says she wants to see the vetting continue and because of that she would vote for Newt in South Carolina this weekend. I’m not sure if her focus is Newt getting vetted more or that he is the best to vet Romney
snip

UPDATE: It just dawned on me why Palin said she’d vote for Newt last night, and it’s simply because if Romney wins it will be demoralizing for the party and others may jump out feeling like Romney is a shoe-in. That’s certainly what the pundits will say. But if Newt wins it proves this election is still wide open and thus it all continues.”

excerpt http://www.therightscoop.com/sarah-palin-if-i-lived-in-s-c-id-vote-for-newt/

Palin is an intellectual.

For instance Sen. Grahamnesty said on one of the Sunday talk shows that Romney could be the first candidate ever to win the first three primaries, and he implied then it would be over. That’s how the GOP establishment thinks, and Sarah Palin knows this.

For one thing, Romney might not have won Iowa (they are still counting), and in liberal NH, only less than half of the voters were Republican, and after Newt received a standing ovation, he might win SC.

IF that happens, Santorum, Romney and Newt would each have won one, so there would go Sen. Graham’s theory.

But, of course, we still don’t know who will take SC, so I better not guess at this point in time either. Time will tell.


67 posted on 01/19/2012 12:12:18 AM PST by Sun (Pray that God sends us good leaders. Please say a prayer now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson