[Hoodat]

Go back and listen to her statement. Sarah Palin is not endorsing Newt. If Perry was ahead of Gingrich and Santorum in the SC polls, then Sarah would be saying vote for Perry. If Santorum were ahead of Gingrich and Perry in the SC polls, then she would be saying vote for Santorum. Palin's statement is nothing more than an attempt to keep Romney from running away with it before Super Tuesday. But don't take my word for it. Listen to what Palin actually said.

If she were endorsing Newt, then she would have come out and said, "I'm endorsing Newt." But she didn't, and she's not.

[onyx]

I posted the video of her interview, thankyouverymuch!

I don’t need to go back to listen again.

You don’t like Newt Gingrich. Sarah Palin does. Get over it.

She’s against Romney’s coronation and knows he needs more vetting: i.e. the voters need to know more about him than the media and GOP-E are telling them!

Given that she’s already said, ABO, Sarah Palin would very much like to see “the process continue” so that Romney doesn’t win, “without a full vetting”, like his tax returns, to cite just one example.

I still stand by my original thoughts on her endorsement: I think her contract at Faux, likely prevents her from formally endorsing any single candidate, given that she’s a paid political contributor, but in this South Carolina race, she most assuredly did state her preference: NEWT GINGRICH!