(Even if he had such an experience, no rational or normal person would announce it to the world. There is obviously something very far out-of-whack with the man's brain. The comment not only suggested some form of perverted impulse. In the context of what the Left, in general, was saying, and now coupled with this new outburst, it suggests a preoccupation with some form of bizarre reverse racial sensitivity--not that anyone, anywhere, would ever imagine Chris a dispassionate commentator.)
William Flax
Matthews isn’t too smart, but he’s bright enough to try to manufacture a controversy. I remember a few years back when Chrissy berated Michelle Malkin. Malkin had contended that one of JF’nKerry’s injuries had resulted from a ricochet from a discharge of his own weapon. Matthews intentionally misstated her actual words of a self-inflicted injury by claiming that Malkin had accused JF’nKerry of “intentionally shooting himself.”
What a load of crap!
No Chrissie. Your balls will remain in my lockbox.
The only acceptable way for a hopelessly insensitive white, male GOP candidate such as Gingrich to address Mr. Williams would be "Senior Guillermo."
I came up with a new word after watching Juan Williams and Newt Gingrich. And now Matthews doubles down. “Raceploitation”
Chrissy has “white guilt” big time. Everything is about race to him.
I have a better name for Juan but can’t use it.
Doesn’t surprise me that Newt called him Juan. They have both worked at FOX News and probably know each other well enough to be on a first-name basis.
Rats can find racist intent behind any molecule in the universe.
“But you know, you go to South Carolina, not everybody has a driver's license, you're 70 or 80 years old, and you're a black voter, you don't have a driver's license, you don't own a car...”
That's not a racist thing to say?
It may be fact, but if Republicans (Newt) quote facts, he's racist. If Matthews quotes facts, it's not racist.
I keep forgetting how the Politically Correct rules work for Liberals.
-PJ