Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Anti-Hillary

I have said this since her husband endorsed him. There is no way the two of them would not endorse the same candidate. It’s unthinkable. (If they didn’t, they would have kept their endorsements private, IMHO.)

In any event, I have to say, while I don’t love Newt, I do like him. I was very impressed with his debate performance last night. I have always said, I’m sick of politicians saying they created jobs, blah, blah, blah. They don’t, the only thing they can do is get out of the way. Last night, when he said that he and Reagan created jobs, and corrected himself, saying that the people created jobs, within the framework of what they set up, I was amazed. Finally some one gave credit where credit was due.

He has a fiery passion that I like. I disagree with him on a number of issues, but I think last night’s debate was a big turning point for me. Newt was on fire! Romney was Romney, Perry looked even less significant and ready to jump out (he will by Monday, folks, I’m almost willing to bet it) Santorum was as angry as ever (and off putting to go with it), and Paul looks less and less “with it” each debate. I know that he’s more intelligent and articulate than what he comes off as in a debate, but while I agree that he is a conservative in the sense that he’s the only one talking about conserving the Constitution, there’s just too much that he doesn’t seem to get on foreign policy (You can uphold the Constitution and still make oodles of bad and dangerous decisions). In fact, Paul’s starting to look more and more confused and a little batty.

I wish we had a better field, but we’ve got what we’ve got. I think Newt may be my candiate. I will never support Santorum because I don’t need his level of Big Government in my life (no one does). Newt’s far from perfect, but he has the intellect, experience, and arguably wisdom to get things done. I think he has been maturing politically over the last few years.

I don’t mind people changing their views with time, as long as it’s a maturation. It’s called growth. In fact, it’s a good thing for everyone. I just hope that Newt continues to grow and become more conservative with time, and have more inspiration and epiphanies as President.


41 posted on 01/17/2012 6:39:32 PM PST by JDW11235 (http://www.thirty-thousand.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: JDW11235
He has a fiery passion that I like. I disagree with him on a number of issues, but I think last night’s debate was a big turning point for me. Newt was on fire! Romney was Romney, Perry looked even less significant and ready to jump out (he will by Monday, folks, I’m almost willing to bet it) Santorum was as angry as ever (and off putting to go with it), and Paul looks less and less “with it” each debate. I know that he’s more intelligent and articulate than what he comes off as in a debate, but while I agree that he is a conservative in the sense that he’s the only one talking about conserving the Constitution, there’s just too much that he doesn’t seem to get on foreign policy (You can uphold the Constitution and still make oodles of bad and dangerous decisions). In fact, Paul’s starting to look more and more confused and a little batty.

I agree with you. Last night was a turning point for me. I want a Gingrich/Palin ticket so bad I could spit. I don't think Perry and Santorum would go to White House and actually get anything done. I think we would have more of good old boy politics...same with Romney. Newt has the gumption to actually get something done...and the smarts to do it.

68 posted on 01/17/2012 6:49:37 PM PST by Shortstop7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

To: JDW11235

Another thing that Newt has JDW, that isn’t mentioned, is connections all over America. He is not an unknown. He surely has a lot of wealthy contacts who will jump on the band wagon if he shows signs of winning. He is ready to be President the day he is sworn in. He knows the ropes and we need somebody like that because time is running out on this country. If I needed to pick somebody who was conservative enough and knew enough of how the “inside” works, I don’t think I could find a more qualified person than Newt G. And yes, he does remind me of Churchill (I remember him well).


75 posted on 01/17/2012 6:53:15 PM PST by WVNan (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

To: JDW11235
I agree with you, I think Newt is my guy too. He is far from perfect, but he is a stark contrast from ObMAO. Romney, is not. I believe Newt will overturn a lot of the mess of the last three years, including Obamacare, I don't have confidence that Romney will do much - I feel like he will throw the conservatives a few bones but leave much of the big government take over intact - or at the very least not dismantle it enough to be effective. Just my gut on that.

I've said before we do not have our perfect candidate in this group - but Newt to me comes the closest, and at some point we have to come together and support the best person...or we get 4 more years of zippy and his insane ass clown posse. Newt is not afraid to call a socialist a socialist, and when the obama machine goes full tilt in the general, I think he can take them. I don't have confidence that Romney will. He just seems wimpy to me on that front. - afraid to say what needs to be said. JMHO
209 posted on 01/18/2012 6:47:48 AM PST by Newton (If Obama is the answer it's probably a stupid question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson