Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court Allows New Plaintiffs in Health Care Law Challenge
Fox News ^ | January 17, 2012 | Shannon Bream

Posted on 01/17/2012 9:39:08 AM PST by maddog55

The Supreme Court on Tuesday allowed the addition of two new business owners to a suit challenging the health care law that was in question because one of the original business owners attached to the case has gone bankrupt.

Supporters of President Obama’s health care law argued that her bankruptcy made Mary Brown ineligible to continue on as a plaintiff, suggesting the entire case could fall apart because of a lack of standing.

Other business owners were attached to the case, but the Justice Department would not stipulate that they met the standards for establishing standing in this case.

(Excerpt) Read more at politics.blogs.foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 01/17/2012 9:39:11 AM PST by maddog55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: maddog55

So anyone whose business is destroyed by ObamaCare has no standing?


2 posted on 01/17/2012 9:57:11 AM PST by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maddog55
Supporters of President Obama’s health care law argued that her bankruptcy made Mary Brown ineligible to continue on as a plaintiff, suggesting the entire case could fall apart because of a lack of standing.

How convenient- kind of like when witnesses against mob bosses are "disappeared"... no witness, no case.

3 posted on 01/17/2012 9:58:00 AM PST by TheBattman (Isn't the lesser evil... still evil?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massgopguy
"So anyone whose business is destroyed by ObamaCare has no standing?"

At this point, one would have a very hard time proving ObamaCare has destroyed a business. In any case, trying to determine that would inject an issue into the decision that is not part of the lower courts' record - which the court is generally loathe to do.

But, the central question for businesses is the penalties that will be assessed for failure to provide health insurance. A business that is not a going concern will not be subject to those provisions, so they have no standing. They will not be harmed if they will no longer exist on January 1, 2014.

It would be a completely seperate action for a business that had suffered actual damages - but, if Congress has passed a law, the President has signed it, and the Supreme Court finds it constitutional, I don't know how you could bring a sucessful suit. Government actions destroy businesses every day - if those actions are taken legally, you have little recourse.

4 posted on 01/17/2012 10:46:13 AM PST by In Maryland ("Truth? We don't need no stinkin' truth!" - Official Motto of the Main Stream Media)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson