[LibsRJerks]

Not “truly important” to Newt?

Come ON — he has a 98% pro-life voting record!

Yes, Santorum has championed this issue for years. But it’s not the only issue.

I’ve fought the pro-life issue since the early 90’s, working in emergency pregnancy centers. It’s an issue that will be fought over for YEARS until Americans change their hearts once again towards the role of women in society.

Do I use it as a litmus when screening out candidates in the first round? You bet I do. But to parse what we have now with this — I think we’re being a bit short sighted.

[LibsRJerks]

I wanted to add — I don’t feel we have the luxury of focusing on candidates basely soley on this issue.

You get Obama for another four years, and you may not even have the chance to FREELY express your views on this subject. That’s how bad it is and how bad it could get.

I really urge you to vote for the candidate who can MOST ensure that Obama will not get another term, and that liberal senators and house members do not get more terms. We need this administration OUT.

[DNA.2012]

It’s an issue that will be fought over for YEARS until Americans change their hearts once again towards the role of women in society.

Change in exactly what ways "towards the role of women in society"?

[hinckley buzzard]

The bane of unborn children is the absolutist, take no prisoner "Prolifer," who will accept nothing less than perfection, thereby dooming untold unborn babies to prenatal death.