Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DiogenesLamp

Well we’ve beaten it to death. You would think the Court would want to resolve this now when it makes no difference to the current candidates rather than waiting until it does make a difference and someone will inevitably be unhappy.


109 posted on 01/17/2012 1:14:31 PM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies ]


To: Brilliant
Well we’ve beaten it to death. You would think the Court would want to resolve this now when it makes no difference to the current candidates rather than waiting until it does make a difference and someone will inevitably be unhappy.

Given the way the courts operate nowadays, I won't be at all surprised if they get it wrong. Kelo v New London, Roe v Wade, etc. Our courts no longer administer the law, they simply reflect the political attitude of whatever judges happen to be in office currently.

I shall not be at all surprised to hear our Supreme Court pronounce "anchor babies" to be legitimate.

110 posted on 01/17/2012 2:51:23 PM PST by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson