Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

*sigh*
1 posted on 01/16/2012 8:15:26 AM PST by Bigtigermike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: Bigtigermike

It’s uncanny how similar this is to 2008. Establishment “next in line” RINO pick (McCain/Romney) surges after NH despite losing to an upstart social conservative outsider in IA (Huckabee/Santorum). The winner of IA can’t capitalize on momentum because someone who has lots of conservative support is pulling votes away (Gingrich/Thompson) while a libertarian (Paul/Paul) and a persistent candidate who is already done stays in for no discernable reason (Giuliani/Perry).

Ironically, Perry endorsed Giuliani in 2008.


105 posted on 01/16/2012 1:41:27 PM PST by PAConservative1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Bigtigermike

W8 4 de-b8s! The numbers will change this week!

Looking forward to tonight. FOX debate 6pm (pacific)


109 posted on 01/16/2012 2:12:05 PM PST by b9 (NEWT all the way)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Bigtigermike
Its now or never people. We need all our peeps out working South Carolina.
111 posted on 01/16/2012 2:32:00 PM PST by Moorings
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Bigtigermike
Strangely, according to the poll breakdown, Newt Gingrich scored exactly zero among the youngest cohort of voters, ages 18-29.

He prefers older women now.

112 posted on 01/16/2012 2:37:49 PM PST by Tramonto (Draft Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Bigtigermike

This is the Insider Advantage? Another words Inside the Beltway poll? Inside the Republican Party Poll?


114 posted on 01/16/2012 2:40:25 PM PST by tallyhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson; TitansAFC; P-Marlowe; onyx; hoosiermama; Cincinatus' Wife; wmfights; Bigtigermike
“The poll is among likely voters who are registered in South Carolina and are likely to vote in the Republican contest. The survey is weighted for age, race, and gender,” said InsiderAdvantage chief pollster Matt Towery.

1. Note above that this poll claims itself that it is weighted only for age, race, and gender.

a. That means it is not weighted for political party of preference.

2. Note as well that the poll claims for itself that it is for likely voters who are registered in S Carolina. It explains further that it means "likely to vote in the Republican primary."

3. This means that it could ALL be democrats, independents, or 3rd partiers who just happen to want to vote, for whatever reason, in the republican primary. We ALL know that there is no reason for democrats to vote in the democrat primary. Obama is unopposed. It isn't likely that zero republicans are included, but the point is that there was absolutely no effort to ensure any breakdown whatsoever.

Personally, I think this is little different (maybe worse) than the reuters poll that included as many democrats as republicans in their sample.

In this poll we don't have a clue what the breakdown is.

116 posted on 01/16/2012 3:06:40 PM PST by xzins (Romney: Vulture Capitalism is Crony Capitalism on Crack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Bigtigermike

On to Victory....again!

129 posted on 01/16/2012 4:54:27 PM PST by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Bigtigermike
*sigh*

Too true - how about a poll of REPUBLICAN voters, not just likely voters?

134 posted on 01/16/2012 8:23:18 PM PST by mrreaganaut (Stupidity killed the cat. Curiosity was framed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Bigtigermike; b9; BagCamAddict; bigbob; Bobalu; CainConservative; CASchack; Cato in PA; ...
.
SC voters: If you liked a 3rd, 4th, 5th place candidate, THINK ABOUT THIS before voting....

Each congressional district will have 2 delegates given to the winner-take-all within the district (that's 14 delegates total)

And Statewide, there will be 11 delegates given to the winner-take-all at the state level

So let's assume Romney is in 1st place in the polls just before the vote.
Let's assume there is ONE close NON-Romney, but he's in 2nd place.

Maybe YOU would prefer a 3rd or 4th or 5th place non-ROMNEY....

BUT IF YOU Vote for that 3rd or 4th or 5th place non-ROMNEY, you have just voted FOR ROMNEY because it is WINNER TAKE ALL!!!!

The ONLY way to NOT give your delegates to ROMNEY is to consolidate all votes behind the LEADING NON-ROMNEY

135 posted on 01/16/2012 11:54:00 PM PST by Future Useless Eater (Chicago politics = corrupted capitalism = takeover by COMMUNity-ISM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson