Obviously written by someone who hasn’t listened to Rush. He is far from a Mitt endorser. I’d say the opposite...he is encouraging what he refers to an anti-Establishment revolution, and he clearly believes Mitt is the “Establishment” choice.
I listen to Rush. Rush led a vigorous attack against Conservative icon Gingrich for a Super Pack Adv against Romney, saying an attack against Romney is an attack against Capitalism. Then he got up off his knees, and washed it all down with some blueberry ice tea.
The liberals said the same thing about Mitt and Clear Channel in 2008.
Others, too:
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/matthew-sheffield/2008/02/04/huckabee-hints-clear-channel-conspiring-romney
Feb 08
>>Speaking at a news conference in Oklahoma, Republican presidential candidate Mike Huckabee floated the idea that the reason the vast majority of America’s conservative talk radio hosts aren’t endorsing him or John McCain is because Mitt Romney’s investment firm owns a significant share of Clear Channel Communications, the nation’s largest radio syndication company.
Speaking at a news conference in Oklahoma, Republican presidential candidate Mike Huckabee floated the idea that the reason the vast majority of America’s conservative talk radio hosts aren’t endorsing him or John McCain is because Mitt Romney’s investment firm owns a significant share of Clear Channel Communications, the nation’s largest radio syndication company.
“Some suggest that the fact that Bain Capital owns a major stake in Clear Channel is on Sean’s network, maybe there’s a correlation. I don’t know.”
The Sean he was referring to had to be none other than Sean Hannity, America’s number-two talk radio host behind Rush Limbaugh.