Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Indictment accuses union members of racketeering
buffalo news ^ | January 10, 2012 | By Matt Gryta

Posted on 01/15/2012 2:21:12 PM PST by reefdiver

Mark N. Kirch, president and business manager of Operating Engineers Local 17 and nine others associated with that Hamburg-based construction union, have been named in a fresh federal racketeering indictment, prosecutors announced Tuesday.

It is the latest development in a six-year-old extortion investigation of Local 17, which earlier saw several guilty pleas.

The 10 were among those indicted in 2008 on similar charges. The latest, superseding indictment, accuses them of participating in a criminal enterprise which forced local and out-of-town employers to hire workers selected by the defendants, as well as threatening — and in some cases, committing — bodily harm, destruction of property and workplace sabotage at construction sites and against innocent bystanders, the prosecutors said.

As was the case in the first indictment, the second one accuses the union members of engaging in a violent scheme to extort jobs and compensation from employers during a 10-year period that ended in December 2007.

Those actions added millions of dollars to the cost of construction projects throughout the region, prosecutors maintain.

Named in the indictment along with Kirch, 52, are union organizer Carl A. Larson, 46; business representative Jeffrey A. Peterson, 49; retired business representative Gerald E. Bove, 66; and business representative Thomas Freedenberg, 55.

Also indicted were Local 17 members Michael J. Caggiano, 42; Jeffrey C. Lennon, 57; Kenneth Edbauer, 66; George Dewald, 54; and Michael J. Eddy, 42.

The 10 defendants were among union members indicted in 2008. Two others at the time have since pleaded guilty.

The latest indictment charges the 10 with conspiracy to commit racketeering, extortion, conspiracy to commit extortion and attempted extortion, prosecutors Charles B. Wydysh and Anthony M. Bruce said.

A superseding indictment generally provides more information, charges and allegations, and often is used by prosecutors to put more pressure on defendants to accept a plea bargain. In the original indictment, all the defendants were charged with extortion, and all except Caggiano and Freedenberg were charged with racketeering conspiracy.

The charges in the latest indictment carry a maximum penalty of 20 years in prison, a $250,000 fine, or both. In addition, should a defendant be convicted of the racketeering charge, his interest in Local 17 would be subject to forfeiture. That would include managers accused in the case, prosecutors said.

Neither the defendants nor their attorneys could be reached to comment late Tuesday, but labor lawyers told The Buffalo News last summer that the Supreme Court ruled in 1973 that labor unions seeking improved terms and conditions of employment cannot be charged with extortion even if their efforts are accompanied by violence, property damage or similar coercive actions.

A federal judge in September denied the AFL-CIO's request to file a friend-of-the-court brief making that argument in the Local 17 case.

The newest indictment is a result of the continuing investigation by the U.S. Labor Department, Office of the Inspector General, the FBI and State Police.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; US: New York
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 01/15/2012 2:21:17 PM PST by reefdiver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: reefdiver

Most Americans would loves to see more of this.


2 posted on 01/15/2012 2:23:10 PM PST by FlingWingFlyer ("Climate Change" my a.... All weather is local.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reefdiver

Who has a license to commit violence if they don’t get their way. Only UNIONS.

“labor lawyers told The Buffalo News last summer that the Supreme Court ruled in 1973 that labor unions seeking improved terms and conditions of employment cannot be charged with extortion even if their efforts are accompanied by violence, property damage or similar coercive actions.”


3 posted on 01/15/2012 2:23:56 PM PST by reefdiver ("Let His day's be few And another takes His office")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reefdiver

Looks like the mafia need to up the bribe payments.


4 posted on 01/15/2012 2:24:21 PM PST by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reefdiver
the Supreme Court ruled in 1973 that labor unions seeking improved terms and conditions of employment cannot be charged with extortion even if their efforts are accompanied by violence, property damage or similar coercive actions.

Unbelievable.

5 posted on 01/15/2012 2:26:56 PM PST by 2111USMC (Not a hard man to track. Leaves dead men wherever he goes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reefdiver
Buffalo and Rochester remain the cities with the highest rate of union membership in the nation -- something like 24%. Of course, it was 27% five years ago.

Union demands made those jobs go bye-bye. The rest are soon to follow, I fear.

6 posted on 01/15/2012 2:42:42 PM PST by BfloGuy (The final outcome of the credit expansion is general impoverishment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reefdiver

Unions are the soldiers of socialism.


7 posted on 01/15/2012 3:32:45 PM PST by Ben Mugged (The truth is incontrovertible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2111USMC
That may be what the Unions want the Supreme Court decision to say, but does it really say that? You would think the reporter would at least read the decision.
8 posted on 01/15/2012 4:02:04 PM PST by fini
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

All contributions are for the
Current Quarter Expenses.


Donate Today!

9 posted on 01/15/2012 4:23:43 PM PST by RedMDer (Forward With Confidence!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: reefdiver

All unions should be prosecuted under the RICO statues. They’re little more than gangs.


10 posted on 01/15/2012 4:31:23 PM PST by jmacusa (Political correctness is cultural Marxism. I'm not a Marxist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reefdiver

How can this be? I thought they were exempt:

http://www.nrtw.org/d/big_labor_special_privileges.htm


11 posted on 01/15/2012 6:03:30 PM PST by dagogo redux (A whiff of primitive spirits in the air, harbingers of an impending descent into the feral.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson