Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: APatientMan

If a rabid dog was running against Obama, I would vote for the rabies infected dog and so should you.


28 posted on 01/15/2012 2:55:05 PM PST by macquire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: macquire; APatientMan

Why do you think that one rabid dog is different than the other rabid dog?


29 posted on 01/15/2012 3:03:50 PM PST by DJ MacWoW (America! The wolves are here! What will you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: macquire
I might vote for the rabies infected dog but I would never vote for the Mittwit. The dog MIGHT be principled which is something of which no rational human being will ever accuse the Mittwit. Let the polo players and trust fund babies and Junior Leaguers and Percival Q. Snobbingtons try to elect the privileged and two-faced Mittwit in November. By then, he will be road kill.

Nor would many others here vote for the Mittwit who is no better than Obozo in white face. I held my nose and voted (only after they were nominated) for Nixon in 1968 and 1972, Ford in 1976, GHW (New World Order) Bush in 1988 and 1992, Dole in `1996, and McCain in 2008. Every one of them was a despicable excuse for a Republican and every time the rationalization forced upon us was that the Demonrat candidate was sooooo much worse and that the republic would surely cease to exist if the Demonrat were elected.

Net result: progressive chronic wasting disease has gutted the GOP (Boehner, McConnell, Cornyn, LAMAR!!!, Corker and a legion of other whores who pose as Republicans in public but have their lips on autosmooch for the backsides of every enemy our movement, our party and our country have ever had) except under Ronald Reagan and, to a lesser extent, under Dubya. No more. I am too seasoned at this point to vote for another unprincipled leftist in GOP drag. McCain retired the trophy and Mittwit will not get my vote. Nominate him at your peril. There are plenty of us who are determined never to vote for him. Third party? Maybe. Refuse to vote for POTUS? Maybe. Romney. Absolutely NEVER.

30 posted on 01/15/2012 3:23:08 PM PST by BlackElk ( Dean of Discipline ,Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Society. Burn 'em Bright!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: macquire; DJ MacWoW

I need to vote for one pro-abortion candidate so that I don’t elect another pro-abortion candidate...Is that the logic?

I’ll pass.

You sound like you’ve been taken hostage and if you don’t pay Romney off with your vote he’ll punish you with 0bama. Paying hostage takers creates an endless cycle. It’s how we got where we are.


31 posted on 01/15/2012 3:49:40 PM PST by APatientMan (Pick a side)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: macquire; BlackElk
If a rabid dog was running against Obama, I would vote for the rabies infected dog and so should you.

I would vote for the rabies infected dog unless Romney was the dog's VP.
54 posted on 01/16/2012 4:59:35 PM PST by Dr. Sivana (May Mitt Romney be the Mo Udall of 2012.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson