Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jeanine and Sarah Jan. 14, 2012 (VIDEO)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=qx0Pqh0kb4Q ^ | 1-14-2012 | Judge Jeanine

Posted on 01/15/2012 7:37:24 AM PST by sheikdetailfeather

Jeanine and Sarah Jan. 14, 2012

http://www.sarahnet.net

(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: South Carolina
KEYWORDS: gingrich; jeanine; palin; sarah
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last
Don't miss this interview! Sarah defends Newt Gingrich wanting to discuss Romney's record and says nobody should be shut up such as Obama and how he pulled the race card to avoid discussing his record, etc.. She gets into a lot more. A LOT MORE!!!
1 posted on 01/15/2012 7:37:35 AM PST by sheikdetailfeather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sheikdetailfeather

The sad part of the interview is that Sarah seems to admit she is beaten. That Sarah Palin documentary was called “The Undefeated,” but the sequel should be called “The Defeated.” She says she believes that her endorsement would only harm a candidate because any time her name is attached to a person or a policy, “controversy” arises. She actually thinks endorsing a candidate will hurt that candidate. This goes a long way to explaining why she didn’t run for president. She believes she has been defined in the public’s mind as a hated figure and doesn’t seem to believe she can do anything to change that. That’s quite sad.

The problem is to face a media onslaught, you need to be willing to fight relentlessly and never, ever give up. You can probably argue that Hilary Clinton is an example where she stuck around and was able to eventually turn her negatives around to a significant degree. Very few people probably have the drive to keep fighting for that long, but Palin seems to have turned out not to be one of them.


2 posted on 01/15/2012 7:45:50 AM PST by JediJones (Newt-er Romney in 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sheikdetailfeather

Sarah is making all sorts of comments about some of the forum last night - and then had to admit, she hadn’t watched a chunk of it.

That sounded really really bad. You are being paid to be a commentator, you should admit up front you missed some of the debate... not after the interviewer “caught you”.

I’m losing respect for Sarah. She will wait to endorse after Mitt wins the primary.... thanks Sarah, for NOTHING.


3 posted on 01/15/2012 7:53:50 AM PST by Reagan69 (I supported Sarah Palin and all I got was a lousy DVD !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan69

She just said she missed the very beginning where Huckabee gave his little speech saying the candidates weren’t allowed to mention each other by name, even though he then allowed in a question for Newt asking him to explain his attacks on Mitt Romney.


4 posted on 01/15/2012 7:58:06 AM PST by JediJones (Newt-er Romney in 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JediJones

huckleberrys son in law is on romney payroll since october.


5 posted on 01/15/2012 8:02:20 AM PST by biggredd1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Reagan69

Liar!! She said she missed the first part where Huckleberry set the rules.


6 posted on 01/15/2012 8:06:22 AM PST by RefudiateObama2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JediJones

What a bunch of crap. Sarah spoke highly of Santorum and he shot up in Iowa, which included an ad that had Sarah’s words in it. Todd Palin endorsed Newt and now he is shooting up in SC. Where would Newt be if he was the only conservative against the rino mitt? Sarah is holding her fire until the right time and I dont know why that is so hard to understand. Sarah hit a home run talking about peeps unable to talk about certain subjects, same as the dunham campaign. There was a recent poll that listed Sarah endorsement in top two of desired endorsements.


7 posted on 01/15/2012 8:08:13 AM PST by biggredd1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Reagan69

I agree. This was a poor appearance, and trying to cover for it by saying she’s just like all the voters—out there trying to live their lives and run their businesses and not having time to catch all the debates. Yikes! For $1M a year, you’d think she could schedule to watch the debates before appearing on network news cover to comment on it.

I’ve been a long-time Palin fan, but this is pretty weak.

Also, she had no idea that Santorum was selling sweater vests as a way to raise campaign funds—not auctioning off his personal clothing for charity or otherwise.

If she’s retreated to trying to simply represent the conservative soccer moms of America, that is a sad ending indeed.


8 posted on 01/15/2012 8:11:42 AM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JediJones

Read later.


9 posted on 01/15/2012 8:11:54 AM PST by llandres (Forget the "New America" - restore the original one!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sheikdetailfeather

What a great interview! Thanks for posting link.
Sarah looks terrific of course. But more importantly she takes on Obama like no one else. She hit the mark by saying we are looking for the best person to undo the harm Obama has done. She also is right on saying no criticism should be off limits because we need to vet these candidates. If Romney can’t answer Gingrich how is he going to handle Obamas onslaught.


10 posted on 01/15/2012 8:15:39 AM PST by weston (As far as I'm concerned, it's Christ or nothing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weston

No candidate speaks as strongly as Newt when it comes to undoing BHO’s radical actions - every time he states what he’ll do in his first hours as President, crowds cheer wildly - with good cause.


11 posted on 01/15/2012 8:25:13 AM PST by llandres (Forget the "New America" - restore the original one!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: sheikdetailfeather

What Palin did say was great, but if I was paying her to comment after the Huck Forum and found that she hadn’t even bothered to watch the whole thing, I’d be pissed.

She was also uninformed about the Santorum sweater vest deal, which is not big deal but taken together I was disappointed that she was not better prepared.

On the other hand, it’s Judge Jeanine which no one watches anyhow.


12 posted on 01/15/2012 8:56:51 AM PST by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weston
What a great interview! Sarah Palin is such a fine speaker. She thinks while she speaks and states one important argument after another without notes or teleprompter, quickly segueing from one subject to the next. And she moves her lips so I , a hard of hearing old man , can read her lips and understand every word. And her gestures while she speaks are delightful. There is no other politician can compare with her speaking talent. Plus she is smarter than the rest of them. What ahame she was forced out. She is the only one I take time to listen to.
13 posted on 01/15/2012 9:02:34 AM PST by tommix2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: sheikdetailfeather

PDS is apparently still alive and well on FR for some posters...


14 posted on 01/15/2012 9:05:08 AM PST by Cringing Negativism Network (ROMNEY / ALINSKY 2012 (sarcasm))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

Watching this I got the feeling that Sarah was not very interested in apprearing on Judge Who’s weakend lineup show. There seemed to be a bit of animosity creeping in.

Guess when you get paid the big bucks, you have to show up, regardless.

Regarding the forum itself, with the “pre-selected” UNDECIDED questioners and the Mitt bias you could cut with a knife, this was barely better than with CNN or any other lib MSM moderator.


15 posted on 01/15/2012 9:06:19 AM PST by X-spurt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: llandres

Yes and he is the only one who warns of vote fraud and says they object to voter ID because they want to cheat.


16 posted on 01/15/2012 9:06:23 AM PST by tommix2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: X-spurt

My take on it was that Palin got annoyed from the early question that exposed she hadn’t actually watched (in full) what she was commenting on. I took it as defensiveness.


17 posted on 01/15/2012 9:08:29 AM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: biggredd1
Sarah is holding her fire until the right time and I dont know why that is so hard to understand.

Like the French rifle - "never fired, only dropped once"?

18 posted on 01/15/2012 9:09:51 AM PST by don-o (He will not share His glory and He will NOT be mocked! Blessed be the name of the Lord forever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: llandres

Palin says we need someone who has solutions, not just soundbytes. This is Newt.


19 posted on 01/15/2012 9:17:54 AM PST by conservative98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

What? Sarah said that she missed the Beginning of the forum when Huckabee was laying out the rules. She wasnt caught in anything....sheesh!!!


20 posted on 01/15/2012 9:26:06 AM PST by Bigtigermike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson