Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This is the first article in a series to be published. The second was already posted by someone else. CFLs are another example of government interference, forcing us down a path when not all of the evidence is in. To paraphrase Nancy Pelosi, we have to force everyone to use CFLs before we can find out if it's a good idea.
1 posted on 01/15/2012 5:16:20 AM PST by Rocky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Rocky

Breaking a single CFL bulb

I’m surprised the sanitation union isn’t more concerned for their union workers who pickup this trash.


2 posted on 01/15/2012 5:19:09 AM PST by FES0844
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rocky
What do the dangers of Global warming, Hydraulic fracturing, and CFL light bulbs have in common?

They are all made up hysterical exaggerations.

If you want to waste money, energy, and time, go ahead and continue to be stupid and use incandescent light bulbs. You are allowed to be ignorant in this country.

8 posted on 01/15/2012 5:43:18 AM PST by faucetman ( Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rocky

Breaking a single CFL bulb in a room can result in mercury vapor levels 300 times in excess of what the EPA has established as safe for prolonged exposure....Read that. What the EPA has established. If they established that oxygen at 1% above what they FEEL is unsafe would you go for it? Mercury is heavier than lead, it does not stay in the breathable region for a long time, and does not off gas until heated a lot more than 120 watts will heat it. This is all BS. Break all the CFLs and florescent bulbs you might run across in a ten year period and you are NOT in a dangerous situation. Our main problem should be where did government find the power to say we have to use these crappy products? Next thing (IN 20 YEARS OR SO) they will will find everyone has reduced ocular powers and mandate everyone must purchase enhanced sight goggles or something else they can make a profit on.


13 posted on 01/15/2012 6:01:38 AM PST by Safetgiver (I'd rather die under a free American sky than live under a Socialist regime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

agenda first.. Wonder how much money the insider traders in Congress made of this deal.


14 posted on 01/15/2012 6:03:18 AM PST by newnhdad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rocky

So what are we supposed to do with these bulbs when they stop working?

Right now I just throw the incandescent bulbs in the trash.

I don’t always have a lot of room in my trash can, so I sometimes put my foot in it and mash it down so I can get more in. This will probably crush the bulb if I throw it in there with the trash.

Am I supposed to drive this bulb to a special haz mat dump to get rid of it?Has one been established in every part of our country? Will I be fined if I am caught throwing one in my trash can?

More unintended consequences.


22 posted on 01/15/2012 6:38:46 AM PST by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rocky
“Breaking a single CFL bulb in a room can result in mercury vapor levels 300 times in excess of what the EPA has established as safe for prolonged exposure.

The last nine words of the above quote are instructional. First, the EPA (containing vast amounts of political quackery) is involved, and, Second, "prolonged exposure" implies either the "gas" hangs around for a really, really long time or you are constantly breaking, on a daily basis, the very expensive and flimsy bulbs (where's the cost savings here?). I would suggest that even a brief exposure to the EPA is infinitely more dangerous.

25 posted on 01/15/2012 7:00:06 AM PST by immadashell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rocky
Just read the EPA's own recommendations for cleaning up a broken CFL Link While the EPA tries to pooh-pooh the danger saying the mercury content in a single CFL is 1/100th that of a mercury thermometer, the EPA regards mercury vapor as dangerous in even the most minute quantities. With CFLs there is no simple sweeping up the broken pieces and dumping them into the trash and this elaborate clean-up procedure is needed because of the obvious health and environmental hazard.
26 posted on 01/15/2012 7:02:47 AM PST by The Great RJ ("The problem with socialism is that pretty soon you run out of other people's money" M. Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rocky

The potential mercury risk is completely overblown BS.

If a bulb breaks, only 0.67 milligrams of mercury (one-third of 40 percent of the 5 milligrams in a typical CFL) might become airborne in the room during the first eight hours, and only a fraction of that would be breathed in. In short, the exposure from breaking a compact fluorescent bulb is in about the same range as the exposure from eating a can or two of tuna fish.

This isn’t politics, it’s science.


27 posted on 01/15/2012 7:10:37 AM PST by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rocky

Mail your broken or burnt CFLs to your Congressman.


29 posted on 01/15/2012 7:36:00 AM PST by Paine in the Neck (Where's he getting these ideas? He's not smart enough to be that stupid all by himself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rocky

I cant beleive the Gov would allow something so dangerous to be sold to the public . . .
Its trash people’s problem, not mine.


36 posted on 01/15/2012 8:47:19 AM PST by ßuddaßudd (7 days - 7 ways a Guero y Guay Lao << >> with a floating, shifting, ever changing persona)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rocky; All

Will the EPA’s “Standard Operating Procedure for Sampling of Vapor Phase Mercury” (below - ref http://www.epa.gov/greatlakes/lmmb/methods/lmsamsvp.pdf) be required to certify your room is safe for re-entry?

Volume 1, Chapter 1. SOP for Sampling of Vapor Phase Mercury
Appendix A. Facilities, Equipment and Reagents

1. Preparation of Field Supplies
- Class 100 Clean Room, Work Stations
- Clean Room Gloves
- Particle-free Wipes
- Clean Room Cap, Gown and Boots
- Milli-Q Water (18.2MÙ/cm)
- Exhaust Hood
- Acetone
- Alconox
- Polyethylene Tubs
- EM Science Tracepur and Suprapur Hydrochloric Acid
- Polytherm Water Bath (Science/Electronics)
- Baker Instra-Analyzed or EM Science Suprapur Nitric Acid
- New Polyethylene Bags
- 20 L Polyethylene Carboys

2. Sample Collection
- Mass Flow Controlled Vacuum Pump (URG, Model 3000-02M)
- Calibrated 300 cc/min. Rotameter (Matheson)
- HDPE Tubing with quick connects
- Black Latex Tubing
- Mercury Sampling Box (UMAQL, See Appendix B)
- Acid-Cleaned 47 mm Teflon Filter Holders (Savillex, PFA Labware)
- 47 mm Preheated Glass Fiber Filters (Gelman Sciences A/E)
- Acid-Cleaned Teflon Jars (Savillex, PFA Labware)
- Teflon-Coated Forceps
- ‘Blanked’ Gold-Bead Traps (UMAQL)
- Teflon Endplugs
- Trap Heater & Variable Transformer
- Acid-Cleaned Teflon Tubing
- Particle-Free Gloves
- Teflon Tape
- Sample Labels
- Field Operator Log Book
- Shipping Boxes

3. Sample Analysis
- Cold Vapor Atomic Florescence Detector (Brooks Rand, LTD.)
- Line Tamer/Conditioner (Shape Magnetronics Model PCLT 150)
- Integrator (Hewlett-Packard Model 3390A)
- Helium, Ultra High Purity Grade (99.999%)
- Mass Flow Controller (Tylan)
- Nichrome Coils (UMAQL)
- Electric Leads
- Variable Transformers (Staco Energy Products Co. Type 3PN1010)
- Cooling Fans
- Gold-Coated Glass Bead Traps (UMAQL)
- Gas Tight Syringe (Hamilton series 1800)
- Injection Port (UMAQL)
- Constant Temperature Circulating Water Bath (Fisher Model 901)
- Instrument Grade Metallic Mercury (Triple Distilled)
- Mercury Flask (UMAQL)
- Certified Immersion Thermometer (Kessler Instruments, Inc. 15041A)


37 posted on 01/15/2012 8:54:47 AM PST by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson