I disagree.
I can find fault with the individual soldier for not taking the steps to ensure the security of their belongings.
I can find fault with the military for not ensuring the security of the soldier’s belongings, if the soldier wasn’t in position to do it himself. The military can always dock the pay of the soldier in question to get the money back.
But I can’t really find fault with the storage company for treating a storage container in default as a storage container in default. When somebody, for whatever reason, stops paying rent, what other option does the storage company have?
>> what other option does the storage company have
Go fight for the Country.