If nobody is willing to do that, we know the Republican candidate is going to get mauled by the Dems and the media.
So it’s definitely an asset that Newt will play just as mean. I have no problem with that.
I agree.
.
.
I think it is.
Tea partiers are just dying to vote for somebody who will stand up and fight for what is right.
If nobody is willing to do that, we know the Republican candidate is going to get mauled by the Dems and the media.
So it’s definitely an asset that Newt will play just as mean. I have no problem with that.
60 percent of the population isn’t paying attention to the primary’s right now . And I live in California so my vote won’t count anyway, but as a God As My Witness, I will vote for any Republican candidate that represents us. No matter what. Our Country cannot survive another 4 years of Obama.
If nobody is willing to do that, we know the Republican candidate is going to get mauled by the Dems and the media.
So it’s definitely an asset that Newt will play just as mean. I have no problem with that.
I agree.
.
.
RE: Tea partiers
Problem Jonty, is that Haley (openly) and Demint (tacitly) support Romney.. Today, DeMint said Romney was “unequivocally pro-life”. Newt is trying to play to the Tea Party, but some of the big name Tea Party types have caved in to The GOP Establishment.
Newt needs Sarah-she’s the only one who can rally the base against Romney. .
“Tea partiers are just dying to vote for somebody who will stand up and fight for what is right.
If nobody is willing to do that, we know the Republican candidate is going to get mauled by the Dems and the media.
So it’s definitely an asset that Newt will play just as mean. I have no problem with that.”
Finally, someone else who shares my perspective. When evaluating candidates, it is essential to consider how the candidate will campaign under the intense propaganda of the Dem party and its well-funded machine in media. The Repub party is fighting against a party that has legislated its own funds (through required union dues), shapes the perspective of new voters (by controlling education), and has a free, vast propaganda machine (in television and print news outlets). Any candidate opposing that kind of political force must be smart and aggressive. I am not speaking in support of any one candidate but only wish to point out that some Republican candidates are just far too weak, myopic, and easy-going to be running for President against the Dem machine.
I don’t want to overdo the comparison but consider the fight for control of the Soviet government following Lenin’s death. Who won that battle? Was it the noble, nice guy? Was it the guy with the best interests of the people at heart? In 2012, in the US, we have to stop the bad guys from destroying the country and our candidate must be tough and his message must be clear and undeniably correct—else we get a corrupt gov’t of despots. Corrupt gov’ts tend to be the norm. What we have is unique, incredibly valuable, and worth being tough to protect. I don’t care if Newt pees on some dead Taliban, I like his smarts and toughness—not an endorsement, just suggesting something the other candidates might want to adopt if they don’t want us to be McCain’d again.