Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cva66snipe; Paradox

Maybe this will help you:
http://www.cwlp.com/energy_services/eso_services_programs/appliance_energy_use_chart.htm

168 kWh / month would seem to be more what you would expect.

8000 kwh is out of sight, must be Al Gore’s fridge


159 posted on 01/16/2012 3:44:49 PM PST by dila813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies ]


To: dila813
168 kWh / month would seem to be more what you would expect. 8000 kwh is out of sight, must be Al Gore’s fridge

Likely so. IF they got away from R-134A with a refrigerant that has a much lower head pressure I might see 50% reduction. The R-134A is about 100 psi higher on the condenser side of the unit than the older R-12. Compressing a gas too 250 psi takes considerable energy.

I did wire in a very low energy chest freezer designed for solar powered homes for a friend. Considering utility power was not available for him the freezer was better than nothing but not by much. Took it forever to pull down. First one he got ran a week before failing.

163 posted on 01/16/2012 4:48:02 PM PST by cva66snipe (Two Choices left for U.S. One Nation Under GOD or One Nation Under Judgment? Which one say ye?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson