He isn’t on an anti-Capitalism tear, he’s on a quest for the truth. If you don’t know or are unaware, I am opposed to crony capitalism (government+corporations) which I consider to be fascist.
Quote:
“[Romney]’s not being attacked for being a capitalist, but for being untruthful. Romney tried to pretend that his business experience was somewhat like his father’s (head of GM), but he was actually not in a productive industry but in a speculative area of the financial industry that profited off of dying companies or even off of killing other companies. This may have its purpose (within reason), but Romney has to be honest about it and defend it.”
“He’s especially got to explain that inconvenient part about the bailout (which is the same kind of crony capitalism that Obama’s crowd has engaged in).”
Livius, #4: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2831481/posts
I am against this too. Where exactly is a venture capital company like Bain involved with the Gov't? Newt isn't even spinning that. What he is talking about is how someone makes a legal living in the Private sector and how immoral that form of profit is over other more "honest" ways. That is how the Regime talks about profit, not GOP candidates running for POTUS.
Here is what your friend Newt thought about Romney all the way back in the olden days about Mittens job creating and private sector experience.
Newt Gingrich praises Gov. Romney's business experience in 2010
This is just like when Newt said the Romney mandates were a great idea before he said they were not.
This whole sour grapes attack that is getting Mitt haters to defend him is worthless. Mittens whole MA Gov record is enough to sink him for good. Why isn't Newt on that?