It's because the PERVERTED FAGGOTS that "run" the "Fashion Industry" want EVERY one of thier "Models" to look like a 12 Year Old boy because THAT is what they pine after!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
To: US Navy Vet
then women need to not buy so darn much. and only clothes that flatter, do not make women look like 12 year old boys.
To: US Navy Vet
Yes and yes. Most red-blooded, heterosexual men prefer women that look like women, not pre-pubescent boys.
To: US Navy Vet
“...disparity between sizes of models and real women “
So models aren’t real women?
4 posted on
01/12/2012 8:28:38 AM PST by
Castigar
To: US Navy Vet
It's because the PERVERTED FAGGOTS that "run" the "Fashion Industry" want EVERY one of thier "Models" to look like a 12 Year Old boy because THAT is what they pine after! That is so disgusting. Especially when it's true.
How many people lived in Sodom and Gomorrah and have we exceeded the threshold they exceeded that caused God to destroy them (and save Lot and family)?
5 posted on
01/12/2012 8:29:37 AM PST by
Lx
(Do you like it, do you like it. Scott? I call it Mr. and Mrs. Tennerman chili.)
To: US Navy Vet
“Not since two became the new four and zero became the new two.”
6 posted on
01/12/2012 8:30:34 AM PST by
Boardwalk
To: US Navy Vet
The magazine reveals that some of todays plus size models are wearing the same size as models Christie Brinkley, Paulina Porizkova and Cindy Crawford at the height of their fame in the 1990s. Considering that these three were not even close to being mildly chubby let alone "plus sized", that is a bit disturbing.
7 posted on
01/12/2012 8:31:15 AM PST by
RockinRight
(If you're waiting to drink until you find pure water, you're going to die of dehydration.)
To: US Navy Vet
In the January issue of PLUS Model Magazine, plus size model Katya Zharkova and a straight size model are seen in the nude in an attempt to open the minds of the fashion industry," which is stepping further away from reality, according to PLUS founder and editor-in-chief, Madeline Figueroa Jones. TTIWWP
9 posted on
01/12/2012 8:32:08 AM PST by
RockinRight
(If you're waiting to drink until you find pure water, you're going to die of dehydration.)
To: US Navy Vet
Duh. Most of the models I see today are pure skank.
To: US Navy Vet
11 posted on
01/12/2012 8:34:10 AM PST by
SENTINEL
(Romney is to Conservatism what Mormonism is to Christianity.)
To: US Navy Vet
This was actually news when... 1980? Sheesh. What woman doesn’t know THAT?
To: US Navy Vet
This is what A REAL WOMAN looks like:
It's because the PERVERTED FAGGOTS that "run" the "Fashion Industry" want EVERY one of their "Models" to look like a 12 Year Old boy because THAT is what they pine after!
Couldn't have put it better.
14 posted on
01/12/2012 8:36:31 AM PST by
End Times Sentinel
(In Memory of my dear Friend Henry Lee II)
To: US Navy Vet
The magazine reveals that some of todays plus size models are wearing the same size as models Christie Brinkley, Paulina Porizkova and Cindy Crawford at the height of their fame in the 1990s. Zharkova, 28, wears a size 14I remember not too long ago reading about a model who was 5'10" and 157 lbs being told she was too heavy to be a plus-size model.
15 posted on
01/12/2012 8:36:56 AM PST by
Drew68
To: US Navy Vet
Twenty years ago the average fashion model weighed 8 percent less than the average woman. Today she weighs 23 percent less
More like women have gotten fatter, not that models have gotten skinnier. We used to joke about “Muffin Tops” in the 90’s but now women, and men, are simply obese.
16 posted on
01/12/2012 8:37:14 AM PST by
CodeToad
(Islam needs to be banned in the US and treated as a criminal enterprise.)
To: US Navy Vet
Looking at the
not safe for work pics (particularly the last one), the "plus" model is normal-size, while the "regular" model looks like she was just released from a nazi concentration camp.
17 posted on
01/12/2012 8:38:34 AM PST by
PapaBear3625
(During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.)
To: US Navy Vet
I used to work for a Garment Manufacturer. One of their divisions was exceptionally high end stuff, mostly for women.
The Division had an "Employees only" sale - got rid of samples, one-offs, and the like. I mentioned it to one of my co-workers, thought that she might like a deal or two.
She thought I was joking. The company only manufactured sizes 0, 1, 2, and 3. My co-worker was, I dunno, "normal"? I didn't ask, but def. not in the 0-3 size range.
And you're right, the place was populated by bitchy Asian women, and even bitchier gays, from the owner right on down. They liked me, OK, though, because I fixed their computers. Before me, if a computer didn't work right, they unplugged it, threw it in a closet, and bought a new one. They had $200-300K in wasted equipment when I got there, most all of it easily reparable...... Place must have just about had a license to print money.
18 posted on
01/12/2012 8:40:50 AM PST by
wbill
To: US Navy Vet
I’ve never understood the “heroin addict” look most of the models seem to be cultivating either.
21 posted on
01/12/2012 8:43:00 AM PST by
cincinnati65
(We've been taken for a ride - by Wall Street and Washington DC - Welcome to Amerika!)
To: US Navy Vet
This surprises anyone? Come on.....it's called entertainment and theater....if the Straits of Hormuz were a size 6......
Stay focused!
24 posted on
01/12/2012 8:46:02 AM PST by
yoe
To: US Navy Vet
It’s OK to weigh 110#, it’s not OK to weigh 110# and be 6 ft. tall. If the models were 5’-4” they would look better and be more attractive.
26 posted on
01/12/2012 8:46:39 AM PST by
central_va
( I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
To: US Navy Vet
A size 6 is now plus size in the fashion world
A size 6 is not what it used to be. I buy vintage and I know. If you fit a size 6 that was manufactured in 1970, the size 6 made today is going to be very, very big on you.
I was just shopping the other day, trying to find a petite size zero or even a 2; girls size 12 are similar, but who wants to walk around wearing glitter, lollipops and unicorns? :(
30 posted on
01/12/2012 8:57:35 AM PST by
Lady Lucky
(A tea party in name only is worse than no tea party at all.)
To: US Navy Vet
I’m going to go against all of you here. Go back to the 1950s and your average woman on the street was much much thinner than the average lardass piggies you see everyday today. They have changed the dress sizes too. Used to be a size 4 was an extremely skinny woman, and a size 6 was about as thin as you could get and still have breasts. Nowdays a size 6 is a chubby little piggy.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson