[Hemingway's Ghost]

Well, we're going to have to agree to disagree, then. I don't think it's particularly a moral duty of this nation to send our men and women into harm's way to help improve the quality of life for people in other nations, nor do I believe it's particularly moral for our nation to rob its citizens of their property to better the quality of life for people in other nations.

It might be laudable to do so, but I don't think its our duty or our obligation.

[jacknhoo]

" I don't think it's particularly a moral duty of this nation to send our men and women into harm's way to help improve the quality of life for people in other nations."


How do you feel about sending our money into other nations to kill their unborn children and destroy the traditional family? Is that "moral" to you?

How about human cloning, for medical research, is that moral to you?

How about bombing a nation that is about to bomb you, is that moral to you?

How about attacking a nation that is committing genocide, killing millions of its citizens, is that moral to you?

It all depends on what the origin of one's morals are. For mankind, without divinely originated morals, we can agree on no specific morals at all.

Just look at abortion, the murdering of innocent defenseless little boys and girls. True Christians agree, it is immoral to murder these boys and girls. Secularists are like you are regarding protecting our neighbors in other nations, they think it is none of their business. Hence, we have 1.5 million children slaughtered every single year in the USA alone.

Sad. Truly sad.