Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

John Bolton to endorse Mitt Romney
CNN ^ | Wednesday January 11, 2012

Posted on 01/11/2012 7:53:41 PM PST by Bigtigermike

(CNN) – John Bolton, the former U.S. permanent representative to the United Nations, is set to endorse presidential candidate Mitt Romney, a source close to Romney’s presidential campaign said Wednesday.

Bolton served in the administrations of former Presidents Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush before former President George W. Bush appointed him the U.N. role.

(Excerpt) Read more at politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2012; 2012endorsements; bolton; endorsements; johnbolton; mittromney; romney2012; sellout
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 161-175 next last
To: !1776!

I am sure we agree, but if God sets before us the leaders we deserve, then surely he sets the field of candidates before us from which he must emerge. There WILL be a way, if we pray, but more and longer chastisement is not out of the question regardless, even IF our prayers are answered, even with the “perfect” nominee. The next president, even if he is “ours”, is no guarantee that by innauguration day our chastisement is over. God knows these candidates and what shall be, shall be. The field is set, and we are a democracy, a Republic, thanks be to God. God has his hand in this. Our man is there, if we deserve him. So, let’s find him and go forward with whom God allows. Be it for correction, or blessing.


101 posted on 01/11/2012 9:45:27 PM PST by RitaOK (LET 'ER RIP, NEWT. NEWT 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: RitaOK; Steve Newton

I don’t advocate the no-vote; I said it wouldn’t work; it sends no message. With Perot we had something like 22%.

Hold the line, for sure. No point in doing much until after FL.

Paul can’t gain but a few points, mostly at Romney’s expense.

Perry and Gingrich as nouveau sons of the south can gain a little more; Santorum has some evangelical backing, though.

It’s kinda like grasshoppers eating each other’s face off, now.

Gingrich could surface with some momentum.

We’ll check back after Florida, FRiend. Respect your opinion and looking forward to comparing notes!


102 posted on 01/11/2012 9:53:48 PM PST by One Name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: RitaOK

Yesss!! My thoughts exactly.


103 posted on 01/11/2012 9:54:02 PM PST by farahdiba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike

I have a new theory about this. I was just reading a Virginia conservative blog (Bearing Drift) which also just endorsed Romney. One of their points was the attacks on Romney for being a capitalist.

I know we have had a good argument over whether that is why he is being attacked, and whether those attacks are right or wrong.

But now I am seeing there was a different question — are the attacks GOOD or BAD for conservatives. And it appears to me that the attacks have backfired. Rather than sink Mitt as we want, they seem to have made people rally to him, or at least defend him, like Rush Limbaugh.

Maybe this would explain part of why Bolton went over to the dark side. I don’t know. I can’t figure out why so many people are turning against us.

Still hoping maybe Santorum can pull this one out.


104 posted on 01/11/2012 9:56:51 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: !1776!

” a lot of people once considered on our side, like Haley, Coulter, Bolton, and others, aren’t backing the conservative candidates. Why? “ <<<<

Yes, and how about the timing? Curious, huh? Panic maybe?
I believe it’s because they (the Establishment) are in a full blown panic and staring down the calendar to get us on their page. We conservatives are not *yet* cooperating, Ron Paul is gaining traction by running third party in OUR party, and three conservative candidates are holding 65% of the Republican support! Wouldn’t you panic? Wouldn’t you call in ALL your chips? This, to the powers that be, means all sorts of chips, the one’s on the table, and those
“under” the table. These endorsers need jobs. Preferably jobs with power, or at least with power titles. LOL.


105 posted on 01/11/2012 9:57:00 PM PST by RitaOK (LET 'ER RIP, NEWT. NEWT 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT
What’s the point?

Think about it a while it will eventually come to you. It's a point that was expressed by Newt, Sarah Palin, Rush Limbaugh, Laura Ingraham and several others these last few days so it's not just something only I have thought up. It's common sense.

All you have to do is go back to 2008 and look into how we got McCain. It will come to you. I think.

106 posted on 01/11/2012 10:13:22 PM PST by tsowellfan (cafenetamerica.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

” Rather than sink Mitt as we want, they seem to have made people rally to him, or at least defend him, like Rush Limbaugh. “ <<<

Desperately they flail. As if capitalism cannot ever be abused, or ever abuse, liberal speak rules. The self-righteous, trying to put lipstick on a pig, fling around smears as if capitalism can not be rigged in favor of the riggers. Starting against Newt, who knows a thing or two about defining plunder when he sees it has taken a beating again, for knowing too much. A ridiculous attack from the get-go. Capitalism is not GOD. It is a preference in a free nation but there are rules for all things out of balance. Newt explained what happened. The rest are spinning what happened.


107 posted on 01/11/2012 10:15:10 PM PST by RitaOK (LET 'ER RIP, NEWT. NEWT 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Terry Mross

Mittens promised Bolton god-hood. Bolton is just waiting for the t-shirt.


108 posted on 01/11/2012 10:16:13 PM PST by CT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike
Another significant endorsement for Romney.

In a well-timed announcement, the Romney campaign on Wednesday rolled out an endorsement from Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach -- the co-author of illegal immigration laws in Arizona and elsewhere. Romney said he wants to work with Kobach to "support states like South Carolina and Arizona that are stepping forward to address this problem."

The campaign also released a statement from Kobach saying Romney would stand "shoulder to shoulder" with states like South Carolina in the illegal immigration fight. Kobach called Romney "the candidate who will finally secure the borders and put a stop to the magnets, like in-state tuition, that encourage illegal aliens to remain in our country unlawfully."

109 posted on 01/11/2012 10:20:47 PM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Wow - the father? You sure he’s not just the 3rd cousin of sodomite marriage? Typically the father of something has to invent it. I have a hard time picturing Romney sitting around with his family conceiving of gay partners get married.

Maybe Romney flip-flopped on this (as he seems to do) but a’ll I’ve ever seen him do is support civil unions (which may not be your cup of tea but is different).


110 posted on 01/11/2012 10:22:19 PM PST by sick1 (Don't fear the freeper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike
My heart is breaking, but it doesn't matter. I so respected Bolton, but it doesn't matter. I will never vote for Romney, but it doesn't matter. I live in WA, and our electoral votes will go to Obama whether I vote or not. My congressman is a RINO (Reichert), my governor stole the election, and our nominee for Senate was a RINO too (Rossi).

We left Canada in '92, and love being Americans. I had to remind my 9-year-old tonight that despite Obama and Romney, we live in the best country on the planet, and the best planet in the galaxy. But tonight, I am disheartened.

So, who gets my vote for president ... Mickey Mouse, Donald Duck, Goofy, or John Galt? Right now, it doesn't matter.

111 posted on 01/11/2012 11:01:11 PM PST by lkco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike

Disappointing but not the end of the world.


112 posted on 01/12/2012 2:19:59 AM PST by Natufian (t)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance; Admin Moderator

“Romney is the father of sodomite marriage and Bolton supports it.”

Statements like that are what give FR a bad name.


113 posted on 01/12/2012 3:42:07 AM PST by Saundra Duffy ( For victory & freedom!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Utmost Certainty

“Is he really even that influential?”

He’d make a great Secretary of State.


114 posted on 01/12/2012 3:47:38 AM PST by Saundra Duffy ( For victory & freedom!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

“And it appears to me that the attacks have backfired.”

Ya think? Maybe it’s because those are the tactics of the loony left.


115 posted on 01/12/2012 3:51:34 AM PST by Saundra Duffy ( For victory & freedom!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike

The fix is in. Once again, our candidate chosen by the puppetmasters. We are so screwed.

I WILL not vote for Mittens. It is a vote for Rove and the establishment. They can screw themselves.


116 posted on 01/12/2012 4:33:52 AM PST by AdamBomb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

U r 100% correct. This thing is rigged. We r nothing more than sheep. Sad


117 posted on 01/12/2012 4:36:17 AM PST by AdamBomb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy

Why? It’s absolutely true.


118 posted on 01/12/2012 5:16:55 AM PST by EternalVigilance (The Republican Party is dead. The Republic is not. At least not yet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: sick1

No. He’s the father of it because he instituted it in Massachusetts. All by himself, on his own authority, contrary to the Constitution and the laws.


119 posted on 01/12/2012 5:19:10 AM PST by EternalVigilance (The Republican Party is dead. The Republic is not. At least not yet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers
Most likely means, Palin's not planning on entering.

LOL, most likely? Of course Palin is not planning on entering the race. Sarah already said no. Not only no, but no with no regrets. No actually means no.

120 posted on 01/12/2012 5:19:10 AM PST by Longbow1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 161-175 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson