Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: af_vet_rr

Are you still beating that dead and horribly mangled corpse.

It’s been explained so many times. the only thing Rick Perry did wrong was use the emotional argument.

He should have explained it as a pragmatic decision which is what it was. He didn’t lead the fight on this anyway, simply signed a bill that the Texas legislature had approved by almost a total majority.

The theory was that illegals in Texas are feeding at the trough. Although most of them work and work hard, they work at low-paying, mostly manual labor jobs, so the children who are born in the USA are entitled to certain benefits, including medicaid and food stamps. And they don’t pay taxes, except sales and SS.

The theory was that if such children met strict criteria, graduated high school with good average, were on the track to become citizens and so on, they could be eligible for in-state tuition rates.

They were not given free tuition. they just paid in-state rates which helped them and helped the colleges.

The hope was that we could move some of these kids into better paying jobs so that they would contribute to Texas economy and not just bleed it.

And, by the way, this was done ten years ago.

And, by the way again, this is not exclusive to Texas.

Perry haters have about 4 dead horses they drag out to beat when anyone says anything favorable about Perry.

It’s pathetic.


114 posted on 01/11/2012 1:36:37 PM PST by altura (Perry 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]


To: altura

Oh, I should have added that the welfare benefits are in all states, not just Texas.


117 posted on 01/11/2012 1:41:44 PM PST by altura (Perry 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies ]

To: altura
He should have explained it as a pragmatic decision which is what it was. He didn’t lead the fight on this anyway, simply signed a bill that the Texas legislature had approved by almost a total majority.

And, by the way, this was done ten years ago.


Perry signed the legislation in 2001, this is true, but don't act like he did nothing else since then other than make the heartless comment in the debate last fall.

In 2005, Perry signed additional legislation to clear some legal issues that arose with the 2001 legislation. In 2007, Perry publicly defended this legislation when Republican legislators were talking about repealing it. In 2010, Perry again defended this legislation during his Texas gubernatorial campaign. In 2011 he made the "don't have a heart" comment".

Perry likes this legislation, and has a consistent record of defending this legislation over the last 10 years. Nobody twisted his arm to support this legislation in the years since, he truly believes in it.

I think he truly believes that people who don't support it, don't have a heart.
128 posted on 01/11/2012 2:11:54 PM PST by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson