Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Are You Sitting Down? (Shortened Title
Rush Limbaugh.com ^ | January 11, 2012 | Rush Limbaugh

Posted on 01/11/2012 12:07:16 PM PST by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last
The entire title is: Are You Sitting Down? Romney Compares His Career at Bain Capital to Obama's Takeover of the Auto Industry!
1 posted on 01/11/2012 12:07:17 PM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

BFLR


2 posted on 01/11/2012 12:11:40 PM PST by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists, call 'em what you will, they ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I dont think Rush wants Romney either...


3 posted on 01/11/2012 12:13:17 PM PST by Mr. K (Physically unable to profreed <--- oops, see?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
The entire title is: Are You Sitting Down? Romney Compares His Career at Bain Capital to Obama's Takeover of the Auto Industry!
Yes, so all of you who defend Romney's anti-capitalist tenure at Bain Capital by conflating it "capitalism" or "free enterprise" can now pour yourselves a tall cool glass of STFU--this includes Rush himself who earlier attacked Gingrich for issuing the same criticisms against the former corporate raider and the one-term former governor who delivered RomneyCare. Romney himself now admits that his private equity firm socialized the costs of his operations onto taxpayers in the form of e.g. bailouts to pension funds that his firm plundered or the loss of U.S. manufacturing jobs in favour of low-wage retail jobs at Staples or Dominos.
4 posted on 01/11/2012 12:14:51 PM PST by Timaeus (Willard Mitt Romney Delenda Est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Rush’s response is in the exact same spirit as mine. He compares his Bain action to something that us conservatives despise.


5 posted on 01/11/2012 12:14:56 PM PST by cuban leaf (Were doomed! Details at eleven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Yes Rush, I'm sitting down.
Yes Rush, I'm sitting down.
Yes Rush, I'm sitting down.
Yes Rush, I'm sitting down.
Yes Rush, I'm sitting down.
Yes Rush, I'm sitting down.

6 posted on 01/11/2012 12:16:40 PM PST by Bloody Sam Roberts ("The price of freedom is willingness to do sudden battle anywhere, anytime..." - Robert A. Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Not even close when it comes to making comparisons. One is capitalism and the other is fascism or marxism, if you like.


7 posted on 01/11/2012 12:19:32 PM PST by Jukeman (God help us for we are deep in trouble.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Oops, comes so naturally for Mitt to show his liberal side of things. The DNC is loving this along with the Mitt vs. Mitt video should keep a lot of the GOP voters away from the polls. I work with the grass roots. We are not seeing much excitement for Mitt. Some of the people who identify as moderates feel ok with him. I hope the convention is a knock down to get the party on the limited government track.


8 posted on 01/11/2012 12:19:43 PM PST by Christie at the beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timaeus

I wonderedhow Rush was going to ease his way out of the huge hole he dug for himself yesterday. tomney madei teasy for him.
AND Rush owes Gingrich an apology. I would compare romney much more to soros.


9 posted on 01/11/2012 12:23:28 PM PST by MestaMachine (obama kills)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

1. Actually, there’s a huge difference. Shareholders have a great deal more freedom in where they invest and who they support for a company CEO than taxpayers do. The difference between the two situations is enormous.

2. To say that what you did was no different than what Obama did when you’re trying to position yourself to run against him is just plain stupid.


10 posted on 01/11/2012 12:25:19 PM PST by Sopater (...where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty. - 2 COR 3:17b)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MestaMachine
AND Rush owes Gingrich an apology. I would compare romney much more to soros.
ftw!
11 posted on 01/11/2012 12:27:44 PM PST by Timaeus (Willard Mitt Romney Delenda Est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

bttt


12 posted on 01/11/2012 12:32:17 PM PST by Matchett-PI ("One party will generally represent the envied, the other the envious. Guess which ones." ~GagdadBob)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

There is a reasonable probability that if the GOP nominates Romney, Traitorbama will be reelected.


13 posted on 01/11/2012 12:35:01 PM PST by Carl Vehse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

This is so depressing. How did we get here.

Santorum’s my choice but I will crawl over broken glass to vote for Candidate ABO. Anyone But Obama. I would vote for Debbie Wasserman Shultz over Obama if I had to. Al Sharpton. Spongebob. Anyone.


14 posted on 01/11/2012 12:35:01 PM PST by fullchroma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
"Today on CBS, 'Romney said that what he did [with Bain Capital] was no different'...from what Barack Obama did bailing out the auto industry."

"Barack Obama and Romney did not do what they did for the same reasons...I'm still struggling with this here, folks. What Romney should have said is,..."

Rush is short-circuiting again. Let's have a look at most of the constituents supporting politicians again. The majority of bipartisan political people are government-connected, employed or pensioned, sucking up all of the debt and stealing from their neighbors.

Avoid buying anything that you don't really need, and see about having property taxes properly adjusted downward.


15 posted on 01/11/2012 12:36:38 PM PST by familyop (We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of rotten politics smelled around the planet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MestaMachine

You wrote: “I wonderedhow Rush was going to ease his way out of the huge hole he dug for himself yesterday. tomney madei teasy for him. AND Rush owes Gingrich an apology.”

You must have been listening to a different program than I was YESTERDAY. Tell me where the “huge hole” is that he supposedly dug:
RUSH

[snip]

“....September 25th, 2008, Gingrich appeared on Fox News and said that the TARP legislation was socialism. He said that it should be defeated. That’s September 25th. On September 28th, Gingrich was on This Week on ABC. He said the question was not whether something needed to be done but whether needed to be TARP, whether needed to be done the next 48 hours. He then stated that he probably would reluctantly vote for it but... So everybody got captured by it. Then on October 1st of 2008 Gingrich wrote in Human Events that his solution would be to get rid of Secretary Paulson and to suspend the market to market rule, which would give Congress the breathing room to develop a plan to replace TARP and to reestablish trust with the American people.

So Gingrich was opposed to TARP.

Romney — everybody — was for it.

TARP is not capitalism! Romney, we’re being told, is the big capitalist. He supported the biggest bailout of banks and sovereign wealth funds.

So my point is all of these allegations going back and forth about who’s a capitalist and who isn’t and who’s willing to defend it, the way it’s manifested itself now, is the establishment’s candidate is under assault for being a capitalist.

His opponents are running around using the language of the left to attack him as a capitalist, and what are they gonna do? Are they gonna defend capitalism? Somebody better.

Because whatever’s happening to Romney now, whoever our nominee is, you can quadruple this in terms of the allegations, what a Republican is: A conservative is, mean-spirited, loves big profits, loves big business, takes money from the poor and gives it to the bankers! All of that crap, it’s gonna be magnified twice what it is in the Republican primary right now.

Meanwhile, in the Oval Office, we have a genuine redistributionist Marxist — and our establishment will not get anywhere near properly characterizing him that way.

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: I do not want to be misunderstood here. You know my job is to communicate, to make the complex understandable. I just want you to understand, I’m not defending Bain. I’m not defending Romney. I’m not defending Newt. I’m not defending Santorum.

I am defending capitalism and conservatism.

And we are seeing, because this has happened, we are seeing in microcosm form the Obama campaign against our nominee in one regard. This is going to be — and it’s gonna be much more amplified than this is, for all the language Newt’s using and whoever the others are attacking Romney for profits and firing people, so forth, wait ‘til the Democrats get hold of this. This is mild compared to what it’s gonna be, so it’s a good proving ground.

Now, why is this happening on the Republican side? I’ll tell you exactly why it’s happening. This is how Romney hopes to win. This is the end result of a strategy.

Mitt Romney has spent a fortune in two election cycles attacking the records of people who are more conservative than he is, by claiming they are not conservative, and he’s attacking them from the right.

Now, what outrages Newt and the others in the past, the people back in 2008, is that Romney is not Mr. Conservative, but he’s positioning himself that way and attacking others for not being.

Newt, I guarantee you, if you ask him, Newt thinks he’s twice the conservative Romney is. So here’s Newt being hit up and ripped for not being conservative by a guy he doesn’t think is anywhere as big a conservative as he is.

Imagine if you were on the end of millions of dollars of attack ads and opposition research, and you think all of it’s a bunch of lies, what are you gonna do? You’re gonna try to retaliate. So that’s where we are.

This campaign is where it is because decisions were made by certain candidates to take it here. So it has to be dealt with as is.

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: Now, speaking of TARP, Newt, he really nailed it in his Human Events piece 2008, October 1st.

Let me give you a brief excerpt of what Newt wrote then. He said, “The TARP plan that relies on the former chairman of Goldman Sachs —” that would be Paulson “— presiding over disbursing hundreds of billions of dollars to Wall Street is a terrible concept and inevitably will lead to crony capitalism and the appearance of — if not the actual existence of — corruption.”

Well, that happened. That’s exactly what TARP was.

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2012/01/10/history_lesson_the_tarp_snow_job


16 posted on 01/11/2012 12:37:22 PM PST by Matchett-PI ("One party will generally represent the envied, the other the envious. Guess which ones." ~GagdadBob)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Wait, I don’t get it - the phrase “(Shortened Title” is not in the full title?!


17 posted on 01/11/2012 12:39:42 PM PST by Revolting cat! (Let us prey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The GOP is dead....and just does not know it yet.

Does Rush?

Or FreeRepublic?


18 posted on 01/11/2012 12:40:00 PM PST by roses of sharon ("Truly I tell you, today you will be with me in paradise." Luke 23:43)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MestaMachine; Timaeus; mickie
You are both correct.

Romney's stupid analogy gave Rush the perfect distraction he needed to get out of the hole today that he dug himself into yesterday.

Gotta hand it to the Mahatma....he did it smoothly and seamlessly.

Well, almost. He walked back a little on both Newt and Mitt today...but I haven't forgotten his emotional outbursts yesterday....and he DOES owe Newt an apology. Rush did immeasurable harm to the Gingrich campaign yesterday...and the harm was not based on well-thought-out logic.

Yesterday was NOT one of Rush's better days.

(Disclaimer: I am not a Newt supporter....I'm a Rush supporter and have listened to him consistently for 22 years. But I'm also an equal-opportunity critiquer.)

Leni

19 posted on 01/11/2012 12:44:20 PM PST by MinuteGal (A Happy New Year is OBAMAGEDDON in 2012 !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Carl Vehse
I believe Santorum, Romney, and Gingrich can beat Obama. Although Rush said that everyone at the time when Bachmann was still in the race, except Paul could beat Obama, I doubt Hartman can.
20 posted on 01/11/2012 12:45:24 PM PST by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson