Puerile speculation. In other words, not gonna happen. Paul has already made it clear he's not going to embarass Rand and taint Rand's political future.
“ill-behaved Paul delegates”.
Paul won’t have control over the crazies that support him. They will be more well behaved at the Convention but the loons who support their head loon will have trouble putting a lid on it.
Rand has already embarrassed himself by supporting his father. He should have detached.
It may have been too early for Rand Paul this election cycle but he is the best candidate out there. His quote that won me over is this one.
"The Democrats want to cut nothing and the Republicans want to cut next to nothing. Neither of them understand the extent of the problem."
What bothers me is all the people on FR taking a shot at Ron Paul when he is the only one I have heard call for making significant cuts to the budget. I believe he said $1 trillion the first year.
For me, there is no more important issue than getting the nation's finances in order and cutting $1 trillion is a good start. Going over the top and calling Paul a Kook takes his contribution - budget cutting - of the table entirely.
What should be said of Paul if you don't like him is, "I have some trouble with Paul on some issues but on his call for cutting $1 trillion from the budget in the first year, he is exactly right."
Or are there some of you on here that don't think that kind of budget cut is necessary?