Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jim DeMint: Romney will win South Carolina
The Washington Examiner's Beltway Confidential ^ | January 10, 2012 | Charlie Spiering

Posted on 01/10/2012 11:07:04 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-145 next last
To: rbmillerjr
The coverage on Fox was so Pro Romney ....

Same thing on ABC and Charlie Rose. See my comment here:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2829090/posts?page=760#760

Jim DeMint gave a "non-endorsement" ENDORSEMENT, walking through an open door to speak euphemistically about Willard and curry favor with him, without (he thinks) frosting the conservatives too badly.

Sorry, Governor, we noticed.

Unfortunately, Rush Limbaugh just walked through the same open door and blistered the conservatives, benefitting Willard. Wonder how close Rush will get to "non-endorsement endorsing" Rictus Romney?

101 posted on 01/11/2012 11:55:50 AM PST by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
"I want to help deliver a conservative Senate, otherwise it doesn’t matter who is in the White House.”

Has his priorities straight anyway.

102 posted on 01/11/2012 12:22:19 PM PST by mrsmith (It's 2012 now. Have you found a Tea Party nominee for your House seat yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
"I think Romney's going to win here," said DeMint, "I think that some of the other that might have had an advantage here have really crossed ways with some Republicans as they've criticized free enterprise concepts." DeMint said, clearly referencing Jon Huntsman, Rick Perry and Newt Gingrich's recent attacks on Romney's record at Bain capital.

No Jim, it's because South Carolina has an open primary in a year when the Democrats have an incumbent, and will be gladly crossing over to vote for Willard in the Republican primary.
103 posted on 01/11/2012 12:52:15 PM PST by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis
I'm not a Mormon, but if Mitt wins the nomination.. I will support him..

Supporting a liberal just because they have an (R) next to their name is still supporting a liberal. The only difference between liberals with (R) next to their name and a (D) next to their name is how fast they want to take us down the road to socialism.

I will not vote for Willard if he gets the nomination. I will vote third party or write in a candidate.

I'm done voting for liberals pretending to be Republicans.
104 posted on 01/11/2012 12:58:11 PM PST by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet
I live in SC and alot of people down here have started believing Romney is the only person that can beat Obama. We are constantly bombarded with this nonsense on Fox News and the other liberal stations.

Then these people weren't Conservatives to begin with, especially if they are letting the MSM dictate their choices. Romney has the advantage of SC being an open primary and the Democrats will cross over for him, but anybody who votes for him in a primary or in the general election if, God forbid, he wins the nomination, is not a true Conservative.
105 posted on 01/11/2012 1:03:56 PM PST by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Roccus; Fresh Wind

Too bad for you guys they didn’t help Romney, but they didn’t.

There was nothing going on other than the fact that some people refuse to get behind Romney.


106 posted on 01/11/2012 1:36:06 PM PST by ansel12 (Romney is unquestionably the weakest party front-runner in contemporary political history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_rr

My thoughts exactly.


107 posted on 01/11/2012 2:33:28 PM PST by NKP_Vet (creep.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard
>> On the one hand, it was Romney or McCain. <<

Romney came in 4th in S.C. during the 2008 primary. The numbers were:

John McCain 147,733 33.15% 18
Mike Huckabee 132,990 29.84% 6
Fred Thompson 69,681 15.63% 0
Mitt Romney 68,177 15.3% 0

108 posted on 01/11/2012 2:40:37 PM PST by BillyBoy (Illegals for Perry/Gingrich 2012 : Don't be "heartless"/ Be "humane")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
"I’m a little concerned about the few Republicans who have criticized some of what I consider free market principles here,” DeMint said."


This is a key factor. Such criticism has achieved the unlikely result of uniting key free market conservatives in defense of Romney just as the campaign enters a crucial phase. It was not the brightest strategical move on the part of his opponents.
109 posted on 01/11/2012 6:57:50 PM PST by rob777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rob777
As I understand it, Mr. Romney's company would buy companies so as to break them up and sell the pieces off for a profit, similar to what the fictional character Gordon Gekko did in Wall Street.
110 posted on 01/11/2012 7:02:35 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet (You can't invade the US. There'd be a rifle behind every blade of grass.~Admiral Yamamoto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: Sprite518

Loosing sucks but the Tea Party lost. They put all their wood behind 5 weak arrows. With 60+% of the vote, fail. Fact is that the Tea Party may have the passion but as far as electoral acumen, we’re newbies on average. At the end of the day to make real change, the TP needs to influence 4-6 electoral cycles and change the core nature of the republican party at the local, state, and national levels. The presidency appears to be a bridge too far this cycle. Basic choice for conservatives is stay home or suck it up and make the best of it.


111 posted on 01/11/2012 8:51:44 PM PST by sick1 (Don't fear the freeper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: sick1
Yeah but it didn't have to be this way. Obama is very beatable but the inside the beltway elite is not ready to give up their life style...

So after Obama is reelected in 2012 you will see the rise of the Tea Party.

The reason being is that the Republicans are not a real opposition party to the Democrats.

Oh I would not be surprised if you see a third Party this election. Possible candidates Ron Paul, Donald Trump, Sarah Palin and even Jessie Venture. I know it sounds like a cast of characters, but I would not be surprised if any of them went Tea Party.

112 posted on 01/11/2012 8:59:08 PM PST by Sprite518
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Sprite518

It didn’t have to be this way if suddenly people just decided to lie down and give up their vested interest without a fight. However I see no reason why the party establishment would just lay down for the Tea Party. It’s a right of passage and if the Tea Party doesn’t earn it - they don’t deserve it. IMO, the Tea Party and conservatives in general played this hand very badly. There are too many choices and ALL of them deeply flawed. IMO, the TP should focus strictly on trying to send as many conservatives to congress as possible for 6 cycles before expecting fundamental change. We need at least 35-40 TP senators and 55-60 Republican ones. Same mix in the house. THEN we can count on having a congress that stiffens a president’s spine.


113 posted on 01/11/2012 9:50:18 PM PST by sick1 (Don't fear the freeper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

What happened to the TEA Party, Senator DeMint?

Romney is NOT TEA Party. South Carolina needs to be the firewall.


114 posted on 01/11/2012 10:01:18 PM PST by onyx (PLEASE SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC - DONATE MONTHLY! If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, let me know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy
This thread is about Jim DeMint. pissant never stopped posting about DeMint and how he should have run for president...in fact, that's how the moderators determined that he was posting under a different screen name after his banning.

Now that DeMint has declared that Romney will win South Carolina, pissant should be pleased. He always liked DeMint, who endorsed Romney in 2008.

Capiche?

115 posted on 01/11/2012 11:40:03 PM PST by Chunga (Ron Paul is a fruitcakey jackass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

Are you kidding me? Huckabee didn’t have a chance, but stayed in the race as McCain’s wingman.

I don’t think Romney is a monster, though. lol

“By the way because of the internet and typing, (keyboards, whatever) I think we should ban names that keep going back and forth from capital letters to small case, to capitals.
McCain? DeMint? come on, I got blisters on my fingers!”

Ha! That’s a movement I can get behind. ;o)


116 posted on 01/12/2012 12:07:52 AM PST by dixiechick2000 (Proud barbarian TEA Party SOB and an evil Capitalist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: prisoner6
;o)
117 posted on 01/12/2012 12:08:31 AM PST by dixiechick2000 (Proud barbarian TEA Party SOB and an evil Capitalist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: prisoner6

“Beating Obama in 2012 is NOT the most important aspect of this election. The most important aspect is working to elect as many conservatives in local, state and congressional offices as possible.”

This bears repeating.

It will “trickle up”.

In 2010, OR had a legislature where the ‘Rats had a super majority. In early 2011, it was so split that there are co-chairmen on each committee. Heh...there are committees who adjourned early because the two sides couldn’t be put in the same room together! lol

The results weren’t as good as in so many other state legislatures, but that is mighty fine for Oregon.

It’s going to be better this year.

Finally, even Oregon is being run more conservatively, now. I never thought I would see the day!


118 posted on 01/12/2012 12:19:57 AM PST by dixiechick2000 (Proud barbarian TEA Party SOB and an evil Capitalist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: rintense
;o)
119 posted on 01/12/2012 12:21:20 AM PST by dixiechick2000 (Proud barbarian TEA Party SOB and an evil Capitalist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Texas Fossil

Amen, bro!


120 posted on 01/12/2012 12:21:50 AM PST by dixiechick2000 (Proud barbarian TEA Party SOB and an evil Capitalist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-145 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson