Skip to comments.
Jim DeMint: Romney will win South Carolina
The Washington Examiner's Beltway Confidential ^
| January 10, 2012
| Charlie Spiering
Posted on 01/10/2012 11:07:04 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140, 141-145 next last
To: rbmillerjr
The coverage on Fox was so Pro Romney .... Same thing on ABC and Charlie Rose. See my comment here:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2829090/posts?page=760#760
Jim DeMint gave a "non-endorsement" ENDORSEMENT, walking through an open door to speak euphemistically about Willard and curry favor with him, without (he thinks) frosting the conservatives too badly.
Sorry, Governor, we noticed.
Unfortunately, Rush Limbaugh just walked through the same open door and blistered the conservatives, benefitting Willard. Wonder how close Rush will get to "non-endorsement endorsing" Rictus Romney?
To: 2ndDivisionVet
"I want to help deliver a conservative Senate, otherwise it doesnt matter who is in the White House. Has his priorities straight anyway.
102
posted on
01/11/2012 12:22:19 PM PST
by
mrsmith
(It's 2012 now. Have you found a Tea Party nominee for your House seat yet?)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
"I think Romney's going to win here," said DeMint, "I think that some of the other that might have had an advantage here have really crossed ways with some Republicans as they've criticized free enterprise concepts." DeMint said, clearly referencing Jon Huntsman, Rick Perry and Newt Gingrich's recent attacks on Romney's record at Bain capital.
No Jim, it's because South Carolina has an open primary in a year when the Democrats have an incumbent, and will be gladly crossing over to vote for Willard in the Republican primary.
To: KevinDavis
I'm not a Mormon, but if Mitt wins the nomination.. I will support him..
Supporting a liberal just because they have an (R) next to their name is still supporting a liberal. The only difference between liberals with (R) next to their name and a (D) next to their name is how fast they want to take us down the road to socialism.
I will not vote for Willard if he gets the nomination. I will vote third party or write in a candidate.
I'm done voting for liberals pretending to be Republicans.
To: NKP_Vet
I live in SC and alot of people down here have started believing Romney is the only person that can beat Obama. We are constantly bombarded with this nonsense on Fox News and the other liberal stations.
Then these people weren't Conservatives to begin with, especially if they are letting the MSM dictate their choices. Romney has the advantage of SC being an open primary and the Democrats will cross over for him, but anybody who votes for him in a primary or in the general election if, God forbid, he wins the nomination, is not a true Conservative.
To: Roccus; Fresh Wind
Too bad for you guys they didn’t help Romney, but they didn’t.
There was nothing going on other than the fact that some people refuse to get behind Romney.
106
posted on
01/11/2012 1:36:06 PM PST
by
ansel12
(Romney is unquestionably the weakest party front-runner in contemporary political history.)
To: af_vet_rr
107
posted on
01/11/2012 2:33:28 PM PST
by
NKP_Vet
(creep.)
To: Lancey Howard
>>
On the one hand, it was Romney or McCain. <<
Romney came in 4th in S.C. during the 2008 primary. The numbers were:
John McCain 147,733 33.15% 18
Mike Huckabee 132,990 29.84% 6
Fred Thompson 69,681 15.63% 0
Mitt Romney 68,177 15.3% 0
108
posted on
01/11/2012 2:40:37 PM PST
by
BillyBoy
(Illegals for Perry/Gingrich 2012 : Don't be "heartless"/ Be "humane")
To: 2ndDivisionVet
"Im a little concerned about the few Republicans who have criticized some of what I consider free market principles here, DeMint said."
This is a key factor. Such criticism has achieved the unlikely result of uniting key free market conservatives in defense of Romney just as the campaign enters a crucial phase. It was not the brightest strategical move on the part of his opponents.
109
posted on
01/11/2012 6:57:50 PM PST
by
rob777
To: rob777
As I understand it, Mr. Romney's company would buy companies so as to break them up and sell the pieces off for a profit, similar to what the fictional character Gordon Gekko did in Wall Street.
110
posted on
01/11/2012 7:02:35 PM PST
by
2ndDivisionVet
(You can't invade the US. There'd be a rifle behind every blade of grass.~Admiral Yamamoto)
To: Sprite518
Loosing sucks but the Tea Party lost. They put all their wood behind 5 weak arrows. With 60+% of the vote, fail. Fact is that the Tea Party may have the passion but as far as electoral acumen, we’re newbies on average. At the end of the day to make real change, the TP needs to influence 4-6 electoral cycles and change the core nature of the republican party at the local, state, and national levels. The presidency appears to be a bridge too far this cycle. Basic choice for conservatives is stay home or suck it up and make the best of it.
111
posted on
01/11/2012 8:51:44 PM PST
by
sick1
(Don't fear the freeper)
To: sick1
Yeah but it didn't have to be this way. Obama is very beatable but the inside the beltway elite is not ready to give up their life style...
So after Obama is reelected in 2012 you will see the rise of the Tea Party.
The reason being is that the Republicans are not a real opposition party to the Democrats.
Oh I would not be surprised if you see a third Party this election. Possible candidates Ron Paul, Donald Trump, Sarah Palin and even Jessie Venture. I know it sounds like a cast of characters, but I would not be surprised if any of them went Tea Party.
To: Sprite518
It didn’t have to be this way if suddenly people just decided to lie down and give up their vested interest without a fight. However I see no reason why the party establishment would just lay down for the Tea Party. It’s a right of passage and if the Tea Party doesn’t earn it - they don’t deserve it. IMO, the Tea Party and conservatives in general played this hand very badly. There are too many choices and ALL of them deeply flawed. IMO, the TP should focus strictly on trying to send as many conservatives to congress as possible for 6 cycles before expecting fundamental change. We need at least 35-40 TP senators and 55-60 Republican ones. Same mix in the house. THEN we can count on having a congress that stiffens a president’s spine.
113
posted on
01/11/2012 9:50:18 PM PST
by
sick1
(Don't fear the freeper)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
What happened to the TEA Party, Senator DeMint?
Romney is NOT TEA Party. South Carolina needs to be the firewall.
114
posted on
01/11/2012 10:01:18 PM PST
by
onyx
(PLEASE SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC - DONATE MONTHLY! If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, let me know!)
To: wardaddy
This thread is about Jim DeMint. pissant never stopped posting about DeMint and how he should have run for president...in fact, that's how the moderators determined that he was posting under a different screen name after his banning.
Now that DeMint has declared that Romney will win South Carolina, pissant should be pleased. He always liked DeMint, who endorsed Romney in 2008.
Capiche?
115
posted on
01/11/2012 11:40:03 PM PST
by
Chunga
(Ron Paul is a fruitcakey jackass.)
To: ansel12
Are you kidding me? Huckabee didn’t have a chance, but stayed in the race as McCain’s wingman.
I don’t think Romney is a monster, though. lol
“By the way because of the internet and typing, (keyboards, whatever) I think we should ban names that keep going back and forth from capital letters to small case, to capitals.
McCain? DeMint? come on, I got blisters on my fingers!”
Ha! That’s a movement I can get behind. ;o)
116
posted on
01/12/2012 12:07:52 AM PST
by
dixiechick2000
(Proud barbarian TEA Party SOB and an evil Capitalist.)
To: prisoner6
;o)
117
posted on
01/12/2012 12:08:31 AM PST
by
dixiechick2000
(Proud barbarian TEA Party SOB and an evil Capitalist.)
To: prisoner6
“Beating Obama in 2012 is NOT the most important aspect of this election. The most important aspect is working to elect as many conservatives in local, state and congressional offices as possible.”
This bears repeating.
It will “trickle up”.
In 2010, OR had a legislature where the ‘Rats had a super majority. In early 2011, it was so split that there are co-chairmen on each committee. Heh...there are committees who adjourned early because the two sides couldn’t be put in the same room together! lol
The results weren’t as good as in so many other state legislatures, but that is mighty fine for Oregon.
It’s going to be better this year.
Finally, even Oregon is being run more conservatively, now. I never thought I would see the day!
118
posted on
01/12/2012 12:19:57 AM PST
by
dixiechick2000
(Proud barbarian TEA Party SOB and an evil Capitalist.)
To: rintense
;o)
119
posted on
01/12/2012 12:21:20 AM PST
by
dixiechick2000
(Proud barbarian TEA Party SOB and an evil Capitalist.)
To: Texas Fossil
120
posted on
01/12/2012 12:21:50 AM PST
by
dixiechick2000
(Proud barbarian TEA Party SOB and an evil Capitalist.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140, 141-145 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson