Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JediJones

If you had a Ron Paul sans the virulent isolationist rhetoric, they’d do decisively well with conservatives IMO. You don’t see a lot of argument here from FReepers against Ron Paul’s domestic policies.


98 posted on 01/11/2012 12:33:06 AM PST by Utmost Certainty (Our Enemy, the State | Gingrich 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]


To: Utmost Certainty

Oh, and also sans the disingenuous, nasty campaigning Paul does.


99 posted on 01/11/2012 12:33:53 AM PST by Utmost Certainty (Our Enemy, the State | Gingrich 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies ]

To: Utmost Certainty; Absolutely Nobama

If you had a Ron Paul sans the virulent isolationist rhetoric, they’d do decisively well with conservatives IMO. You don’t see a lot of argument here from FReepers against Ron Paul’s domestic policies.


Are you out of your mind? Abortion okay in states? Fags in the military? Fag marriage? All drugs legalized?


108 posted on 01/11/2012 12:53:09 AM PST by little jeremiah (We will have to go through hell to get out of hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies ]

To: Utmost Certainty

I think he’s got a lot more problems than just the isolationist rhetoric. There are the conspiracy theories, OWS-style paranoia about banks, coded racist language, drug legalization, pro-secession of states, etc. However I do agree that he is getting Tea Party voters based on his willingness to drastically cut spending. He went up 10-15 points from 2008 in IA and NH. That is significant and makes him more than an easily dismissable fringe candidate.


166 posted on 01/11/2012 7:09:24 AM PST by JediJones (Newt-er Romney in 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies ]

To: Utmost Certainty
"If you had a Ron Paul sans the virulent isolationist rhetoric"

Please get it straight!

"Isolationism is the policy or doctrine of isolating one's country from the affairs of other nations by declining to enter into alliances, foreign economic commitments, foreign trade, international agreements, etc., seeking to devote the entire efforts of one's country to its own advancement and remain at peace by avoiding foreign entanglements and responsibilities."

"Nonintervention or non-interventionism is a foreign policy which holds that political rulers should avoid alliances with other nations, but still retain diplomacy, and avoid all wars not related to direct self-defense. This is based on the grounds that a state should not interfere in the internal politics of another state, based upon the principles of state sovereignty and self-determination. A similar phrase is "strategic independence".[1] Historical examples of supporters of non-interventionism are US Presidents George Washington and Thomas Jefferson, who both favored nonintervention in European Wars while maintaining free trade. Other proponents include United States Senator Robert Taft and United States Congressman Ron Paul."

180 posted on 01/11/2012 10:22:18 AM PST by Afronaut (It's 1984)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson