Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Utmost Certainty

I think it’s contemptible that we have a group of people on this site along with a ton of pundits, most important among them Charles Krauthammer and NRO editors who can’t grasp the basic truth in this article.

Is the Romney camp, including the hopelessly ignorant Ann Couter, so naive to think that the Obama camp would not be on him like a bad smell if he were to get the nomination? Let’s vette him now.

On the one hand if under scrutiny Romney ends up looking better to everyone, Newt is doing Romney a favor, on the other hand I fear that in doing this Newt may be cutting his own legs off.

I suspect that we will see what the article here says, that Romney, like Gordon Gecko, went in for the expressed purpose, NOT TO MAKE JOBS AS HE SAYS HE DID, but as a predator to pilfer those companies that were ripe for the picking. Perfectly legal, but is that the guy who is best poised to beat Obama?

I think not.


4 posted on 01/10/2012 1:48:59 PM PST by nikos1121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: nikos1121

“At its peak in 1970, the Kansas City plant, then owned by Armco Steel Corp, employed 4,500 people. Poor market conditions forced a wave of layoffs in the early 1980s and led the company to prune its product line. By the early 1990s, the plant focused on two items: wire for products such as mattress springs and tires; and high-carbon balls and rods used by the mining industry to pulverize rocks.”

ARMCO’s fault.

From this comment: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2829920/posts?page=33#33

So a dying company ended up dying? How much of that death was due to the economic & regulatory policies the Obama Regime supports?


8 posted on 01/10/2012 1:56:38 PM PST by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: nikos1121

That’s the issue! Newt is clearly the superior alternative but he is in fact cutting his own legs off.

Moreover, he is pushing the focus to some weird and maybe not even nonsequitor.

Whose name is coming up in all this? Mutt, effing, Romney.

This guy outta send thank you cards to his competitors for elevating him as the front runner.

Circular firing squad from that gang that all of a sudden can’t shoot straight.

This goes on much longer and I’m done. I’ll tune out the election because it will be ‘08 all over again.


9 posted on 01/10/2012 1:57:35 PM PST by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously, you won't live through it anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: nikos1121
The problem is that the Republicans attacking Romney are not doing so on the basis of "this is an issue on which you will be vulnerable to Democratic attacks. The dmeocrats will kill you on this, and that's why you can't be the nominee." That would be perfectly proper.

Instead, they are using the language of the left to criticize Romney on the substance of what he actually did. "You took greedy profits and left those workers without a job. That is wrong."

Sadly, there are no winners in this. The Republicans who are attacking them diminish themselves by adopting the language of the left, and Romney looks bad because it will be an albatross in the general election.

22 posted on 01/10/2012 2:21:56 PM PST by Bruce Campbells Chin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson