To: Cowgirl of Justice
If the 10th circuit court is right, who gets to decide what law rules the people? Clearly not the people who approved the amendment. If the 10th circuit court decided Sharia or Scottish law, or International Law is suitable, what say do the people have? Apparently they cannot say no.
How is this not tyranny?
14 posted on
01/10/2012 1:22:40 PM PST by
Old North State
(Don't blame me, I voted for Pedro)
To: Old North State
It’s a legislative/executive loophole of the courts
gone haywire. Courts should interprete individual
cases or send back what they do not like for
reevaluation. They should not be general like this and vague.
A major corruption case of judges and cops should
warrant a call up of the militia or a volunteer counter
law enforcement volunteer corp seceding from obedience to such rulings.
Keep these judges in power but away from effectiveness.
83 posted on
01/10/2012 3:46:34 PM PST by
JudgemAll
(Democrats Fed. job-security Whorocracy & hate:hypocrites must be gay like us or be tested/crucified)
To: Old North State
It’s a legislative/executive loophole of the courts
gone haywire. Courts should interprete individual
cases or send back what they do not like for
reevaluation. They should not be general like this and vague.
A major corruption case of judges and cops should
warrant a call up of the militia or a volunteer counter
law enforcement volunteer corp seceding from obedience to such rulings.
Keep these judges in power but away from effectiveness.
84 posted on
01/10/2012 3:47:42 PM PST by
JudgemAll
(Democrats Fed. job-security Whorocracy & hate:hypocrites must be gay like us or be tested/crucified)
To: Old North State
“How is this not tyranny?”
Because it IS tyranny.
119 posted on
01/10/2012 6:23:10 PM PST by
ought-six
( Multiculturalism is national suicide, and political correctness is the cyanide capsule.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson