[Fantasywriter]

Your reply was the height of sanctimony. I asked you to quote my offensive words and you were UNABLE to do so. Quote exactly what I said that got you so worked up-—i.e.: provide my exact words w a link—or stop being such a jackass.

As for S. Logan, answer this. What conservative in the history of the world has ever answered a question w a default, knee-jerk resort to Moral Equivalence? I know of no case where any conservative ever has; Moral Equivalence is anathema to conservatives.

Liberals, though, live and breathe Moral Equivalence. They resort to it as naturally as a fish swims in water.

[DTxAg]

Quote exactly what I said that got you so worked up-—i.e.: provide my exact words w a link—or stop being such a jackass.

As I said before, your original post was nonsensical (if you can't find your own initial post questioning Sherman Logan in this thread, that's on you). You took to questioning a 5-year Freeper based on an accusation that he/she was an Obot troll because he/she disagreed with the interpretation of a SCOTUS case. Your post was nonsensical since you asked another Freeper whether he/she thought Obama suffers from a specific psychiatric condition, as if that proved anything. You apparently didn't think your question through, since someone can say "no I don't think Obama suffers from that particular mental disorder" or "I don't make psychiatric diagnoses" and still be conservative.

You've now ratcheted that up by continuing to question a 5-year Freeper, apparently based on his/her belief that all politicians lie. And if you want sanctimonious, read your recent posts to Sherman Logan. If you'd like to criticize other Freepers by defending the honesty of politicians, go for it.