That post doesn’t mention anything about the governor’s responsibility toward vetting presidential candidates.
Of course, this idea, again, isn’t new:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2824280/posts?page=31#31
“Ummmm, you’ve ignored that the first half of the unanimous opinion of 3 based the meat of their decision on denying that the governor had any responsibility to vet presidential candidates.”
No, it just said they were idiots that had nothing to appeal, but I guess I thought this because of your later post and not because I took the time to actually read the decision and determine that the OP’s Red Herring about the NBC had no bearing whatsoever on the question he posed - I still doubt his intentions in posting this in the first place.