Your point would be well taken if it were not for the fact that the bakery stamp is just one link in a long historical chain of evidence of a Jewish presence. That chain debunks the Pali narrative, which is one reason they fight so hard against archaeological activity, especially around the Har Habayis.
Evidence of a chain of Jewish presence, it is. A “stamp of approval” on Jewish claim to the land, as A7 makes it out, it is not. The Muftists will have a terutz for that, too. On the other hand, there’s no need to listen to their terutzim, because really, they have the burden of proof for their ridiculous fictitious history, not the burden of rebuttal. A7 sometimes forgets who is asserting and must prove, in their eagerness to present a new item of rebuttal evidence.