[Wonder Warthog]

"What degrees does this "evaluator" have? Where did he go to school? What specific jobs has he held? The fact is, in spite of the intense interest in this whole story, no one has been able to dig up one shred of evidence that this guy even exists. You know absolutely nothing about this guy except that Rossi vouches for him."

The witnesses, who were of high technical expertise themselves, were judging the exhibited expertise of the evaluator, which they rated high. If that isn't sufficient for you, I don't see what else would be convincing. Specific jobs held, where schooled, are irrelevant to the judgement of expertise. For that, they don't even need to know the guy's name.

"If I had hard evidence, I wouldn't be posting on a web site, I would be contacting the FBI.

LOL. What a maroon you are. You're not worth wasting further bandwidth on.

[Johnny B.]

I don't see what else would be convincing. Specific jobs held, where schooled, are irrelevant to the judgement of expertise. For that, they don't even need to know the guy's name.

I don't know how I could have been so blind! Of course it doesn't matter whether we know anything about this anonymous guy, sine the anonymouse customer trusts him!

Or, rather, Rossi says that the anonymous customer trusts the anonymous agent.

How could anyone doubt Rossi with that kind of rock-solid evidence!