The OTHER outside experts who were attending the demostration were judging the TECHNICAL QUALFICATIONS of the evaluator.Are you suggesting that someone who is knowledgable in a field couldn't also be engaged in fraudulent behavior?
The reason the evaluator's identity is important not to determine whether he is technically competent, but to determine whether he is trustworthy.
Getting a "certification" from an anonymous source is useless.
I "ought" to just copy and paste Kevmo's list of all the things Rossi had to do in order to maintain his "fake". Your supposition is in the same category. I think we need to coin a new pschyological term to fit your contining lunacy----I think "skeptomania" is accurate and descriptive.