From wiki:
Hostile takeovers
A hostile takeover allows a suitor to take over a target company whose management is unwilling to agree to a merger or takeover. A takeover is considered “hostile” if the target company’s board rejects the offer, but the bidder continues to pursue it, or the bidder makes the offer directly after having announced its firm intention to make an offer.
DO YOU UNDERSTAND THIS DEFINITION. It is only considered hostile because management is opposed to it. To the “little” people who actually own the company it is not hostile - it is someone giving them more for their investment. Yet you invoke “honesty” like a libtard.
I wonder if many of the freepers here are really anti-liberty or if they just need an education in how venture capital works and why it is better than central planning. I think they fear what they do not understand.