To: Kaslin
How would you like it if... This really is a good highlight of one of the fundamental flaws of Paultardology. We are looking for a Commander in Chief of the United States Armed Forces, not an Aristotelian philosopher who will play moral equivalency games. The question should be simple, what is in our interest, period. Paul and his cam playing these games like 'well what if you were Iran, wouldn't you want one..yadda, yadda' is just philosophical coffee-shop talk.
39 posted on
01/09/2012 2:29:22 PM PST by
mnehring
To: mnehring
Who decides what is in our interest ?
Our Founders said we only go to war with a Congressional Declaration.
42 posted on
01/09/2012 2:37:35 PM PST by
vooch
To: mnehring
Well it is good that Paul and Paultards are approaching the subject of Ron Paul as President on a purely philosophical coffe-shop hypothetical basis - because it has zero basis in reality!
49 posted on
01/09/2012 2:55:55 PM PST by
allmendream
(Tea Party did not send the GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson