Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: trumandogz

Kodak actually invented digital photographic technology. The Eikonix Digitizer was developed in the mid 1980’s. It was Photoshop’s father. And the ATEX Messaging system was early e-mail. I know. I was there.


9 posted on 01/09/2012 11:56:16 AM PST by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: massgopguy

And then they failed to carry the technology through to the consumer digital camera stage or digital storage stage.


12 posted on 01/09/2012 12:04:26 PM PST by trumandogz (Rick Perry Scored 10% on the Iowa Test.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: massgopguy
Kodak actually invented digital photographic technology.

Absolutely right. But the company became dominated by business-school dopes whose only background was in marketing. They kept offering new formats for which there was no need, like Instamatic, Disk, and APS, and cranked out junky cameras instead of the serious pro gear they once made.

The fate of Kodak reminds me of the near-death experience at Apple when visionary perfectionist Steve Jobs was replaced by a dope from Pepsi.

14 posted on 01/09/2012 12:08:41 PM PST by hellbender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: massgopguy

Yeah, and the Chinese invented gunpowder and paper. That gave them fireworks. When westerners got their hands on it we got canons and books.


35 posted on 01/09/2012 12:46:09 PM PST by cuban leaf (Were doomed! Details at eleven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: massgopguy

Kodak has great R&D and their digital products are top rate. So what happened?

I heard from someone within the company that Kodak knew there would be a transition from film to digital and planned strategically for it. The problem was it happened much sooner and faster than they planned - by about five years.

I was following digital at the time and it shocked me how quickly it became dominant.

But, even so, Kodak should have moved faster once the revolution took hold. Perhaps it was their size, maybe an IBM-like problem. Perhaps a problem with pensions and making big changes quick.


39 posted on 01/09/2012 12:54:21 PM PST by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson