Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LostInBayport

At least the US Constitution explicitly protects property rights, so it’s much harder for the Supreme Court to completely ignore the issue. The Canadian Constitution has no property protection so it’s open season on property rights. Our governments can expropriate and impose land use restrictions with impunity.


53 posted on 01/09/2012 3:01:44 PM PST by littleharbour
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]


To: littleharbour
At least the US Constitution explicitly protects property rights, so it’s much harder for the Supreme Court to completely ignore the issue.

That's true, but that doesn't stop them getting it wrong, like in the disastrous Kelo decision. Anthony Kennedy swung that one for the dark side.
55 posted on 01/09/2012 3:10:43 PM PST by LostInBayport (When there are more people riding in the cart than there are pulling it, the cart stops moving...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson