[Old Teufel Hunden]

"I will admit that we are not sure that Palin endorsed Newt, if you will admit, unlike your original post declaring it fact, that Palin DID NOT endorse Newt."

Absolutely! I think we are on the same page. My whole point in my first post was not if Todd ever endorsed Newt or not. He may have. But the article makes this declarative statement, then never backs it up with a quote from Todd. Many people on here run with it as Todd supporting Newt when there is no basis of fact from the article. Until there are more definitive quotes from Todd, we just don't know. I opened up the article in expectation that the headline was correct. As I read through it, it's murky at best. It bothers me that people are taking just the facts from this article and assuming all kinds of things from it.

[ez]

I reread your first post, and we are on the same page. I took your statement “That’s not an endorsement” to be a blanket statement, but upon rereading realized you qualified it with “based on the article.”

It is wise to suspect bad motives from the press.

[ez]

I reread your first post, and we are on the same page. I took your statement “That’s not an endorsement” to be a blanket statement, but upon rereading realized you qualified it with “based on the article.”

It is wise to suspect bad motives from the press.