Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: editor-surveyor

LOL, that’s rich. YOU post that “obviously Sarah does not endorse Newt,” and then accuse everyone else of speaking from emotion? You may be fooling yourself, but you are not fooling me. Pot, kettle...

Your SUPPOSITION that Sarah “obviously” does not support Newt is not supported by the facts. Wishful thinking is more like it.


201 posted on 01/09/2012 1:58:49 PM PST by ez (When you're a hammer, everything looks like a nail.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies ]


To: ez

You never listen to what Sarah Palin says.

Just a short time ago (same appearance where she said Huntsman anf Bachman were history) she openly questioned Newt’s “supposed” intelligence (WRT the debates) when asked if she would serve as his VP candidate. Did that sound to your ears like an endorsement?

If she were so inclined, that would have been a golden opportunity to come foreward with fluent praise, rather than derision.

Your ears hear only what they want to hear.


235 posted on 01/09/2012 3:59:14 PM PST by editor-surveyor (No Federal Sales Tax - No Way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson