To: ez
" Still we dont really know, do we, until the transcript is found."
That was actually my point in my original post of which some people have lauded my reading the article. And some people have attacked me. You may be right and he did say he supported him. It's just that I distrust ABC news in general and need to see sufficient evidence before I believe one of their breaking stories.
This article also points out how manipulative the news media can be. They make a declarative statement in the beginning of the article without ever actually backing it up with proof contained within the article. Even many on here, the supposedly astute politicos got snookered by the headline without demanding further proof before believing it.
To: Old Teufel Hunden
I will admit that we are not sure that Palin endorsed Newt, if you will admit, unlike your original post declaring it fact, that Palin DID NOT endorse Newt.
203 posted on
01/09/2012 2:01:13 PM PST by
ez
(When you're a hammer, everything looks like a nail.)
To: Old Teufel Hunden
Rewrite...I will admit that we are not sure that Palin endorsed Newt, if you will admit, unlike your original post declaring it fact, that we are not sure Palin DID NOT endorse Newt.
206 posted on
01/09/2012 2:02:14 PM PST by
ez
(When you're a hammer, everything looks like a nail.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson