You are a funny guy.
I never said I was a Paul supporter, but in the current situation with multiple poor choices I encourage a healthy dialog and focus on specific issues and facts.
There are a lot of “if you’s” in your rant that are certainly presumptive. When you go off into “your boy who has no problem with a bunch of nuts killing my family..” it tells me that you would rather rant and scream than focus on issues and you may be challenged sticking to facts.
I personally don’t think the Republican party is serving us well regardless of whom you are supporting. That does not mean that I dislike all Republicans - I have rarely voted for other parties.
I proudly served this country and I’m a retired Naval Aviator - sorry, no trips to Russia or any current Communist countries (you probably missed the fact that the Soviet Union no longer exists). I happily carry a Glock 27 and have a CHP and I do support the Constitution as drafted.
What about you? What are your credentials as a self appointed judge? Who are you pushing and why? How are their positions different?
Thanks and have a nice day...
Yes, but when it comes to Paul I am deadly serious. Why you may ask? Well let me respond to another of your statements:
What about you? What are your credentials as a self appointed judge? Who are you pushing and why? How are their positions different?
The only credential I need is that of American Citizen, father and husband. Protecting my family outranks all other concerns. From that I can judge and support how I see fit those who best serve that purpose and those who pose a threat as well. Paul is most definitely the latter and I have little patience with those who support or defend in at any level be it in passing or full on Paulistinian mode...
I never said I was a Paul supporter, but in the current situation with multiple poor choices I encourage a healthy dialog and focus on specific issues and facts.
There are a lot of “if you’s” in your rant that are certainly presumptive. When you go off into “your boy who has no problem with a bunch of nuts killing my family..” it tells me that you would rather rant and scream than focus on issues and you may be challenged sticking to facts.
My "rant" holds, I have no issue with facts, if you have even been casually reading Paul articles on FR you see more than ample evidence of his support of Iran etc.
You want to focus on debatable issues fine. Paul has points on domestic issues I can agree with. But not with him as the messenger. His idiocy pollutes anything substantive he could provide. Find and support or argue for another champion for those ideas that are valid.
As for the rest of Paul's "positions", there is no debate, no issue to "discus", it is simple yes or no. Does one support Terrorist or not with their words and actions. Paul does, mainly in words for now. I fear for his actions if he ever had a position of power.
I proudly served this country and I’m a retired Naval Aviator - sorry, no trips to Russia or any current Communist countries (you probably missed the fact that the Soviet Union no longer exists).
Thank you for your service, as for the Soviet Union, that was my point, it no longer exists due to Reagan's efforts that Paul took issue with.
Have a nice day as well.