Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: thackney

Those must be the older plants.

When the switch was made at Pine Bend, it took about 15 seconds to decide to make 100 percent low sulfur.


20 posted on 01/09/2012 9:47:22 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (Gimme that old time fossil fuel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: Eric in the Ozarks
When the switch was made at Pine Bend, it took about 15 seconds to decide to make 100 percent low sulfur.

That sounds bizarre. They had desulfurization capacity they were not using?

I suspect there was a couple years work prior to the switch from planing, buy and installing equipment.

21 posted on 01/09/2012 9:53:33 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

In 2006, the refinery completed a $350 million project to produce ultra low-sulfur diesel fuels and convert diesel fuel to gasoline to meet growing market demand.

http://www.fhr.com/refining/minnesota.aspx


22 posted on 01/09/2012 9:54:48 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

I found a little more detail.

One of the largest projects in refi nery history was completed in May when Pine Bend’s new hydrocracker unit was brought online. This $350 million project includes the new hydrocracker, new hydrogen plant, storage tanks and expanded cooling water capacity. The project was built so that the refi nery can begin producing ultra low sulfur diesel fuel.

http://www.fhr.com/upload/PBCommmattersnl10-06.pdf
Page 2

Construction on the hydrocracker project began in May of 2004.
Here are some interesting facts from the two-year project:
• 1,600 tons of structural steel
• 22 miles of large piping
• 5,109 valves
• 4,548 gaskets
• 29,260 bolts
• 26,355 components
• 353,850 pounds of cracking catalyst
• 1.4 million work hours on fi eld construction
• Peak workforce of 780 contractors
• Two large reactors, each weighing
approximately 1.5 million pounds


24 posted on 01/09/2012 10:00:01 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson