Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Scoutmaster

true. It just seems with the other cases (so far) he was careful to go in there when no one else was there and assaulted the kids after a long grooming process.


41 posted on 01/09/2012 5:11:13 AM PST by Scotswife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: Scotswife; Scoutmaster

I don’t know whether the story the attorney gave is just the shortened version of what happened the day the kid says he was assaulted. There could be many more details that weren’t released to the public, and I suspect the attorney didn’t lay all of his cards on the table. It’s predictable that Sandusky’s attorney would say that this one case was different...therefore this victim is out for money. While that’s entirely possible, it’s also possible that what we’ve heard about this new allegation is only a piece of what’s actually been told in confidentiality to the attorney. The AG’s office is looking into it, and won’t comment at this time.

Keep in mind that Amendola has outright said that the other kids were all colluding together just for the money, when the truth is that these kids told nobody until they were called (by subpoenas) to the AG’s office. They were ashamed of what happened to them...of what Sandusky did TO them, and they would have rather kept silent about the whole affair until they were called to testify about it. When they began to realize that Sandusky had done this to others, they began to realize someone might believe them about the horrors they suffered.


49 posted on 01/09/2012 6:08:34 PM PST by FamiliarFace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson