Fine. And what is the objection to analyzing/discussing that the rights and principles guaranteed in the Constitution have been so distorted in the past 200 years as to be unrecognizable by the Founders?
Ever think about how freedom’s greatest hour of danger is now?
As in: "If only they had listened to Ron Paul. He warned against the wild, excessive spending and the foreign adventurism that helped break the USA."
I doubt very much if Gingrich, etc. will be so mentioned.
Keeping in mind they (politicians) are all the same, I’m liking Ron Paul, it would be more of the same bottleneck in Congress when it comes to getting anything done with him being president, a good thing in my opinion until a sane majority rules in the Senate and House. It’s either Ron Paul or I want O’bummer back in until voters finally see and understand what happens when you elect a puppet with no values and no direction other than “We want your money to do as we please with. C-Ya on the golf course.”
Newt would be bearable if he actually did what he said he wanted to do ex. arrest Judges, stop big government, etc. he compromises to much to be effective.
Other than that the current crop are all a bunch of losers distracting from the loss of the ‘rule of law’ with no jail time mentioned for anyone like Holder, Corzine, O’bummer, ATF, banksters, SEC, Congress itself, Homeland Security...the list is endless and basically ignored, even less or representative taxation is a pipe dream.
If the underlying current (Congress approval rating @10%) gave us conservative majorities in the House and Senate who knows what could be accomplished but all for naught as debt coming due will catastrophic.
Ron Paul recently gave us some exposure to the Federal Reserve’s books, I can handle that kinda of crazy.