Sordo: “Aside from this post, everything else I’ve seen is post-election.”
And why, exactly, is this important? You and BladeBryan both seem to think that the dual-citizen parent issue must be contested before the 2008 election otherwise it must be concocted or invalid.
Even if the question wasn’t raised until last week, it doesn’t negate the validity of the question. Why is timeline so important to this discussion?
As more and more researchers get on board, there may be even more areas that we find where Obama is ineligible or anti-constitutional. Especially since we are prohibited from access to so many of Obama’s vital records. As this information is exposed to the light of day, I would expect a good number of justifications that this President should be removed or impeached. Because this President has been so protective of his records, we are forced to spend a lot of time speculating and guessing what may be “behind the curtain”. If he were more open with his information, we could immediately eliminate the vast majority of these theories. Most people who have something to hide do just that.
Yeah. I posted this to a troll way back when:
Thu Apr 15 08:40:26 2010 · 249 of 402
Interesting.
Before the primaries we made the case.
Trolls like you said it wasn’t the right time because he wasn’t actually his party’s candidate.
Before the main election we made the case.
Trolls like you said it wasn’t the right time because he wasn’t actually the president elect.
Before the electoral college vote we made the case.
Trolls like you said it wasn’t the right time because he hadn’t actually been elected until the electoral college said so.
Before the congress accepted the electoral college vote we made the case.
Trolls like you said it wasn’t the right time because he hadn’t actually been approved until the congress accepted the electoral college vote.
Before was sworn in we made the case.
Trolls like you said it wasn’t the right time because he hadn’t actually violated the constitution until he became president.
Now that he is president, trolls like you say it’s too late, you should have said something sooner!
Well, I won’t attempt to speak for Blade Bryan, but there are different reasons to understand the history here.
Some folks have insisted that they have been 2-parent advocates from the beginning, that they were taught this in school and that the judiciary are traitors for not supporting this interpretation of NBC. The known record of FR posts doesn’t support this. The actual written history we have on FR is the 2-parent requirement was barely mentioned prior to October of 2008.
Understanding that the 2-parent requirement is relatively new to the discussion gives some indication that it might not be terribly well supported and probably isn’t a great thing to hang your hat on.