parkssp, included the entire transcript of last night’s debate and also Newt’s answers to some..not all of the questions.
Gingrich highlights in last nights debate
STEPHANOPOULOS: Mr. Speaker, do you agree, send back troops into Iraq right now?
GINGRICH: Well, no. But let me put it in context.
I was very honored today to have Bud McFarlane come to introduce me at our veterans rally. Bud was for five years Ronald Reagans national security adviser, and I worked with him in the 80s on the strategy to defeat the Soviet empire.
Heres the key thing to remember. If youre — if youre worried about the Iranians in Iraq, develop a strategy to replace the Iranian dictatorship and Iraq will be fine. If you want to stop Wahhabism, get an American energy policy so no American president ever again bows to a Saudi king, and then you can put pressure on the Saudis, because you have enough American energy. Stop...
(APPLAUSE)
STEPHANOPOULOS: Speaker Gingrich, I know you agree with Governor Romney again on his views on President Obama, but how would your plans on job creation distinguish you from Governor Romney?
GINGRICH: Well, youre talking about infrastructure?
STEPHANOPOULOS: Infrastructure. And more broadly, job creation.
GINGRICH: But — but — but lets stick with infrastructure then, because I think its a very big, very important topic. You cannot compete with China in the long run if you have an inferior infrastructure. Youve got to move to a twenty first century model. That means youve got to be — youve got to be technologically smart and you have to make investments.
So for example here, the Northern Pass project ought to be buried and should be along the states right of way. Which means youd need these modern techniques to bring electricity from Quebec all the way down to Boston in a way that also preserves the beauty of northern New Hampshire. I would have an energy program designed to get us free from Saudi Arabia, Iran, Venezuela, two-thirds of the government revenue from that would go to debt reduction and to paying off the debt.
One-third would go to infrastructure, which would give you the ability to have an infrastructure investment program that would actually get us back on track and you look at places like the highways youre describing, the bridges the governor just described. If you dont have some systematic investment program, then you are not going to be able, I think, to compete with China and India.
STEPHANOPOULOS: Speaker Gingrich, you just heard Governor Romney...
(APPLAUSE)
STEPHANOPOULOS: — make his case. Hes...
(APPLAUSE)
STEPHANOPOULOS: Youve made the case on several occasions that hes not the man to carry that message for the Republican Party.
Why not?
GINGRICH: Well, look, I think thats a good message and I agree with him. A — a little bit harsh on President Obama, who, Im sure in his desperate efforts to create a radical European socialist model, is sincere.
(LAUGHTER)
GINGRICH: But, you know, I think The Wall Street Journal captured it the other day in their dialogue, when their editorial board met and they said I had a very aggressive pro-jobs program, zero capital gains, 12.5 percent corporate tax rate, 100 percent expensing for all new equipment to dramatically modernize the system, abolish the death tax.
And they said that, by contrast — this is their words, not mine — that Governor Romneys program was timid and more like Obama. Now, I would think those are fighting words. And, frankly, if he wants to fight with The Wall Street Journal on that, I wouldnt blame him.
But I do think theres a difference between a bold Reagan conservative model and a more establishment model that is a little more cautious about taking the kind of changes we need.
Thanks. I caught the first two of those clips. Totally forgot their was a Sunday debate but was at work so didn’t get a chance to watch it.
Reluctantly, it looks like I may climb aboard the Newt machine, though I still don’t really trust him. I like Santorum a lot, but he won’t be able to last the whole contest.
However, I think we have somewhat of an advantage this year that we didn’t in 2008 in regards to vote-splitting. Someone will have to school me on the awarding of delegates, but assume Romney wins FL, Newt goes 2nd, and Santorum 3rd. From what I had thought, FL wasn’t winner take all because it was before March, or is it? If it’s not and Santorum drops out, my guess is that he would release his delegates to Newt, or at least a majority of those delegates would go to Newt.