I’ve been following this election only as time permits. I don’t know much about Huntsman; I do know that he is considered a RINO, but not why.
Tonight was my first real look at “that 1% generic guy” and I thought Huntsman gave some of the more intelligent answers in the debate.
Romney is just too smart. He won the debate, not due to substance, but because he knows exactly how to say the right words to fan the conservative flames a bit in everyone’s heart. He scares the urine out of me; I wouldn’t be surprised if he were a sociopath.
Newt was my favorite — he clearly has brains, but he used them to express substance, not on empty populist rhetoric.
I’ve been critical of Perry, but other than that Iraq war commentary, he did very well in this debate.
Santorum was so-so.
These abc schmos in their folding chairs are in love with mitt romney.
What the HELL happened to Mary Matalin’s hair?
Agreed, and and these are my preferences, in your order of presentation. Anyone but Obama, Romney, and Paul.
Huntsman is a RINO because the first thing that he did after Hussein was immaculated (while the conservative movement was reeling and trying to recover and figure out how to endure the coming socialism) was to jump feet first into embracing the Kenyan Communist’s offer to be his point man in China.
Huntsman happily galloped into the Hussein era to work in Beijing, implementing the policies of the worst President in at least 165 years.